Search - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Merve Ozturk Agaoglu"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Original Article

    Comparison of Cavum Septum Pellucidum Size in Euploid and Aneuploid Fetuses

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023;45(9):511-516

    Summary

    Original Article

    Comparison of Cavum Septum Pellucidum Size in Euploid and Aneuploid Fetuses

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023;45(9):511-516

    DOI 10.1055/s-0043-1775847

    Views13

    Abstract

    Objective

    The aim of the present study is to compare the cavum septum pellucidi (CSP) z-score in euploid and aneuploid fetuses and to investigate the performance of the CSP width/length and CSP width/biparietal diameter (BPD) ratios as a diagnostic marker in aneuploidy.

    Methods

    A total of 54 patients, 20 aneuploid and 35 euploid fetuses, between 18 and 37 weeks of gestation, were included in this retrospective study. The CSP width z-score was compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the CSP width/length and CSP width/BPD ratios to predict aneuploidy.

    Results

    The median CSP width was 4.8 mm (range, 1.8 to 8.5 mm) in the euploid group, and 5.4 mm (range 3.1 to 8.4 mm) in the aneuploid group. Cavum septum pellucidi width z-score, CSP width/length ratio, and CSP width/BPD ratio were significantly higher in fetuses with aneuploidy than in fetuses with normal karyotype (p = 0.001; p = 0.013; p = 0.028). In the ROC analysis, the CSP width/length ratio had the optimal cutoff value of 0.59, with 72.0% sensitivity and 58.0% specificity, and for the CSP width/BPD ratio, the cutoff value was 0.081 with 83.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity for detection of aneuploidy.

    Conclusion

    CSP width z-score was found to be increased in aneuploid fetuses. The CSP width /BPD ratio can be used as a new marker for predicting aneuploidy.

    See more
    Comparison of Cavum Septum Pellucidum Size in Euploid and Aneuploid Fetuses

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report –
correction
editorial
editorial –
letter
letter –
other
other –
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article –
review-article
review-article –
Session
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Authors' Reply
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editor's Note
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Previous Note
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Thesis Abstract
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE