Breast self-examination Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Trabalhos Originais

    Frequency of performance and accuracy of breast self-examination in the detection of breast lumps in women who underwent mammographic examination

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1998;20(1):37-43

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Frequency of performance and accuracy of breast self-examination in the detection of breast lumps in women who underwent mammographic examination

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1998;20(1):37-43

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031998000100007

    Views9

    We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to evaluate the accuracy of the breast self-examination (BSE) in the detection of palpable breast lumps and the relation to its frequency of performance. Two thousand six hundred and seventy two women who have had a mammogram in a private clinic in Vale dos Sinos-RS between January 1994 and July 1997 were asked about BSE performance frequency. They were divided in two groups: group I (monthly), group II (almost never). The women who referred performing BSE on a occasional basis were excluded from the main analysis. The woman was asked wheter she or her physician had palpated something in her breasts. The patient's BSE findings were compared with those of her physician (based on the patients' report). The sensitivity of the BSE was higher in group I compared to group II (57.4% versus 33.3%; rho<0.05). We concluded that there is an association between frequency of performance and sensitivity of BSE to detect breast lumps.

    See more
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Breast self-examination among medical students

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(5):287-290

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Breast self-examination among medical students

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(5):287-290

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000500007

    Views7

    Purpose: to evaluate the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination among medical students and to determine possible factors associated with this practice. Method: the authors used a questionnaire to gather information about the students and their knowledge of this self-examination. This questionnaire also allowed the authors to verify the frequency with which the female students performed breast self-examination. The chi² test and Student's "t" test were used, when applicable, to check the association of certain factors. Results: of the 348 questionnaires which were answered, 16% (55) were submitted by 5th year medical students, who had already attended the Gynecology course; 43% were answered by females, 62% of the students had medical doctors among their relatives, and 17% had a family history of breast cancer. In terms of breast self-examination, 95% knew about the method. Of the 149 females who answered the questionnaire, only 64% checked their breasts regularly. The reasons given for not performing self-examination varied: 24% considered themselves to be too young, 4% thought they would not have cancer, 9% listed fear as the reason, 19% reported they were too lazy, and 44% of the female students had no clear reason for not performing breast self-examination. Neither the knowledge nor the practice of the breast self-examination were associated with the subjects the students had or had not yet taken in medical school, with a family history of breast cancer or with the fact that one or more relatives were medical doctors. Conclusion: breast self-examination is known by practically all the medical students; nevertheless, only one third of the female students performed it regularly. This fact highlights the importance of emphasizing breast self-examination among medical students, so that they can help to disseminate this practice among the general population, rather than delegating this responsibility to the midia.

    See more
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Breast self-examination: frequency of knowledge, practice and associated factors

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2003;25(3):201-205

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Breast self-examination: frequency of knowledge, practice and associated factors

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2003;25(3):201-205

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032003000300009

    Views8

    PURPOSE: to study frequency of the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination (BSE), characterizing some factors that may interfere in its practice. METHOD: during one month, 505 women, who were patients of the "Centro de Saúde Escola-Marco (Belém-Pará)", were interviewed, answering questions about the practice and knowledge on breast self-examination and associated factors. Statistical analysis was perfoprmed using the chi2 test. RESULTS: 96% of the women knew about BSE. Among these, 58.9% learned about it via the midia. However, the way that provided the most correct practice was medical orientation (37.5%). Only 21.8% of the women performed the examination monthly. The main reason for the low adhesion was unfamiliarity with the technique (48.2%). Women between 30 and 39 years presented the highest percentage of monthly practice (30.2%). The women (58.2%) who carried out the monthly examination had at least an incomplete high school degree. In 58.7% of the cases, the gynecologist did not stimulate the practice of the BSE. CONCLUSIONS: although BSE is known by practically all the interviewees, more than one third of them do not practice it. The main reason of the low adhesion was the unfamiliarity with the technique. Level of instruction and age of the women interfered in the practice of BSE, but presence of breast cancer cases in the family did not.

    See more
    Breast self-examination: frequency of knowledge, practice and associated factors

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE