Breast self-examination Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1998;20(1):37-43
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031998000100007
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to evaluate the accuracy of the breast self-examination (BSE) in the detection of palpable breast lumps and the relation to its frequency of performance. Two thousand six hundred and seventy two women who have had a mammogram in a private clinic in Vale dos Sinos-RS between January 1994 and July 1997 were asked about BSE performance frequency. They were divided in two groups: group I (monthly), group II (almost never). The women who referred performing BSE on a occasional basis were excluded from the main analysis. The woman was asked wheter she or her physician had palpated something in her breasts. The patient's BSE findings were compared with those of her physician (based on the patients' report). The sensitivity of the BSE was higher in group I compared to group II (57.4% versus 33.3%; rho<0.05). We concluded that there is an association between frequency of performance and sensitivity of BSE to detect breast lumps.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1998;20(1):37-43
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031998000100007
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to evaluate the accuracy of the breast self-examination (BSE) in the detection of palpable breast lumps and the relation to its frequency of performance. Two thousand six hundred and seventy two women who have had a mammogram in a private clinic in Vale dos Sinos-RS between January 1994 and July 1997 were asked about BSE performance frequency. They were divided in two groups: group I (monthly), group II (almost never). The women who referred performing BSE on a occasional basis were excluded from the main analysis. The woman was asked wheter she or her physician had palpated something in her breasts. The patient's BSE findings were compared with those of her physician (based on the patients' report). The sensitivity of the BSE was higher in group I compared to group II (57.4% versus 33.3%; rho<0.05). We concluded that there is an association between frequency of performance and sensitivity of BSE to detect breast lumps.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1999;21(5):287-290
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000500007
Purpose: to evaluate the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination among medical students and to determine possible factors associated with this practice. Method: the authors used a questionnaire to gather information about the students and their knowledge of this self-examination. This questionnaire also allowed the authors to verify the frequency with which the female students performed breast self-examination. The chi² test and Student's "t" test were used, when applicable, to check the association of certain factors. Results: of the 348 questionnaires which were answered, 16% (55) were submitted by 5th year medical students, who had already attended the Gynecology course; 43% were answered by females, 62% of the students had medical doctors among their relatives, and 17% had a family history of breast cancer. In terms of breast self-examination, 95% knew about the method. Of the 149 females who answered the questionnaire, only 64% checked their breasts regularly. The reasons given for not performing self-examination varied: 24% considered themselves to be too young, 4% thought they would not have cancer, 9% listed fear as the reason, 19% reported they were too lazy, and 44% of the female students had no clear reason for not performing breast self-examination. Neither the knowledge nor the practice of the breast self-examination were associated with the subjects the students had or had not yet taken in medical school, with a family history of breast cancer or with the fact that one or more relatives were medical doctors. Conclusion: breast self-examination is known by practically all the medical students; nevertheless, only one third of the female students performed it regularly. This fact highlights the importance of emphasizing breast self-examination among medical students, so that they can help to disseminate this practice among the general population, rather than delegating this responsibility to the midia.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1999;21(5):287-290
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000500007
Purpose: to evaluate the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination among medical students and to determine possible factors associated with this practice. Method: the authors used a questionnaire to gather information about the students and their knowledge of this self-examination. This questionnaire also allowed the authors to verify the frequency with which the female students performed breast self-examination. The chi² test and Student's "t" test were used, when applicable, to check the association of certain factors. Results: of the 348 questionnaires which were answered, 16% (55) were submitted by 5th year medical students, who had already attended the Gynecology course; 43% were answered by females, 62% of the students had medical doctors among their relatives, and 17% had a family history of breast cancer. In terms of breast self-examination, 95% knew about the method. Of the 149 females who answered the questionnaire, only 64% checked their breasts regularly. The reasons given for not performing self-examination varied: 24% considered themselves to be too young, 4% thought they would not have cancer, 9% listed fear as the reason, 19% reported they were too lazy, and 44% of the female students had no clear reason for not performing breast self-examination. Neither the knowledge nor the practice of the breast self-examination were associated with the subjects the students had or had not yet taken in medical school, with a family history of breast cancer or with the fact that one or more relatives were medical doctors. Conclusion: breast self-examination is known by practically all the medical students; nevertheless, only one third of the female students performed it regularly. This fact highlights the importance of emphasizing breast self-examination among medical students, so that they can help to disseminate this practice among the general population, rather than delegating this responsibility to the midia.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2003;25(3):201-205
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032003000300009
PURPOSE: to study frequency of the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination (BSE), characterizing some factors that may interfere in its practice. METHOD: during one month, 505 women, who were patients of the "Centro de Saúde Escola-Marco (Belém-Pará)", were interviewed, answering questions about the practice and knowledge on breast self-examination and associated factors. Statistical analysis was perfoprmed using the chi2 test. RESULTS: 96% of the women knew about BSE. Among these, 58.9% learned about it via the midia. However, the way that provided the most correct practice was medical orientation (37.5%). Only 21.8% of the women performed the examination monthly. The main reason for the low adhesion was unfamiliarity with the technique (48.2%). Women between 30 and 39 years presented the highest percentage of monthly practice (30.2%). The women (58.2%) who carried out the monthly examination had at least an incomplete high school degree. In 58.7% of the cases, the gynecologist did not stimulate the practice of the BSE. CONCLUSIONS: although BSE is known by practically all the interviewees, more than one third of them do not practice it. The main reason of the low adhesion was the unfamiliarity with the technique. Level of instruction and age of the women interfered in the practice of BSE, but presence of breast cancer cases in the family did not.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2003;25(3):201-205
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032003000300009
PURPOSE: to study frequency of the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination (BSE), characterizing some factors that may interfere in its practice. METHOD: during one month, 505 women, who were patients of the "Centro de Saúde Escola-Marco (Belém-Pará)", were interviewed, answering questions about the practice and knowledge on breast self-examination and associated factors. Statistical analysis was perfoprmed using the chi2 test. RESULTS: 96% of the women knew about BSE. Among these, 58.9% learned about it via the midia. However, the way that provided the most correct practice was medical orientation (37.5%). Only 21.8% of the women performed the examination monthly. The main reason for the low adhesion was unfamiliarity with the technique (48.2%). Women between 30 and 39 years presented the highest percentage of monthly practice (30.2%). The women (58.2%) who carried out the monthly examination had at least an incomplete high school degree. In 58.7% of the cases, the gynecologist did not stimulate the practice of the BSE. CONCLUSIONS: although BSE is known by practically all the interviewees, more than one third of them do not practice it. The main reason of the low adhesion was the unfamiliarity with the technique. Level of instruction and age of the women interfered in the practice of BSE, but presence of breast cancer cases in the family did not.
