Reproducibility of results Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Artigos Originais

    Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index in Brazilian pregnant women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2007;29(8):396-401

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index in Brazilian pregnant women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2007;29(8):396-401

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000800003

    Views1

    PURPOSE: to translate and to validate the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Brazilian pregnant women. METHODS: ninety-two pregnant women attended at a low risk prenatal clinic, with diagnosis of the pregnancy confirmed by precocious ultrasonography, participated in the research. Initially, we translated the FSFI questionnaire for Portuguese language (of Brazil) in agreement with the international criteria. Cultural, conceptual and semantics adaptations of FSFI were accomplished, because of the differences of the language, so that the pregnant women understood the subjects. All the patients answered FSFI twice, in the same day, with two different interviewers, with an hour interval from one to other interview. After 7 to 14 days, the questionnaire was applied again in a second interview. Reliability (internal intra and interobserver consistence) and the validity of the constructo (to demonstrate that questionnaire measures the sexual function) were appraised. RESULTS: Cultural adaptations were necessary for us to obtain the final version. The internal intra-observer (alpha of Chronbach) consistence of the several domains oscillated from moderate to strong (0,791 to 0,911) and the interobserver consistence varied from 0,791 to 0,914. In the validation of the constructo, were obtained moderate correlations to fort among the final scores (general) of FSFI and of Female Sexual Quotient (QS-F) that has the capacity to evaluate the feminine sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: FSFI was adapted to the Portuguese language and to the Brazilian culture, presenting significant reliability and validity; it could be included and used in future studies of the Brazilian pregnant sexual function.

    See more
  • Artigos Originais

    The reproducibility of VOCAL endometrial volume measurement: importance of the step rotation

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2006;28(1):38-43

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    The reproducibility of VOCAL endometrial volume measurement: importance of the step rotation

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2006;28(1):38-43

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006000100007

    Views2

    PURPOSE: to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of endometrial volume measurements using the VOCAL®-imaging program (Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis). METHODS: one three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound dataset of the endometrium was obtained from each of five infertile women with different endometrial volumes. For each 3-D dataset, the endometrial volume was calculated by two different observers using the manual mode in four different rotational steps (30º, 15º, 9º and 6º). Ten measurements were obtained with each method and observer from each 3-D dataset. We have used one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post-test to verify the differences among means and the intraclass correlation coefficient to test reliability. RESULTS: rotational methods employing a rotation step of 30º were associated with lower endometrial volume readings in 3 of the 5 patients. There were no significant differences between the means obtained by the 15º, 9º or 6º step rotation. No significant difference was found between the means obtained by the two different observers. The intraclass correlation coefficients were significantly lower with 30º (all under 0.984) than with the other step rotations (all above 0.996). CONCLUSIONS: the use of a rotational step of 15º or less provides reliable readings of endometrial volume: there were no significant differences between the means calculated by the two observers, associated with highintraclass correlation coefficient (>0.996). We recommend the 15º step rotation because it is quicker to be performed than 6º and 9º.

    See more
    The reproducibility of VOCAL endometrial volume measurement: importance of the step rotation

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE