Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Regina Amélia Lopes Pessoa Aguiar"

We found (3) results for your search.
  • Original Article

    Do We Know How to Avoid OASIs in Non-Supine Birth Positions? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(10):581-587

    Summary

    Original Article

    Do We Know How to Avoid OASIs in Non-Supine Birth Positions? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(10):581-587

    DOI 10.1055/s-0039-1697986

    Views1

    Abstract

    Objective

    To evaluate the association between the upright and supine maternal positions for birth and the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs).

    Methods

    Retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 1,728 pregnant women who vaginally delivered live single cephalic newborns with a birth weight of 2,500 g. Multiple regression analyses were used to investigate the effect of the supine and upright positions on the incidence of OASIs after adjusting for risk factors and obstetric interventions.

    Results

    In total, 239 (13.8%) births occurred in upright positions, and 1,489 (86.2%) in supine positions. Grade-III lacerations occurred in 43 (2.5%) patients, and grade-IV lacerations occurred in 3 (0.2%) women. Supine positions had a significant protective effect against severe lacerations, odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0,47 [0.22- 0.99], adjusted for the use of forceps 4.80 [2.15-10.70], nulliparity 2.86 [1.44-5.69], and birth weight 3.30 [1.56-7.00]. Anesthesia (p<0.070), oxytocin augmentation (p<0.228), shoulder dystocia (p<0.670), and episiotomy (p<0.559) were not associated with the incidence of severe lacerations.

    Conclusion

    Upright birth positions were not associated with a lower rate of perineal tears. The interpretation of the findings regarding these positions raised doubts about perineal protection that are still unanswered.

    See more
    Do We Know How to Avoid OASIs in Non-Supine Birth Positions? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
  • Artigos Originais

    Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014;36(2):65-71

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014;36(2):65-71

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032014000200004

    Views1

    PURPOSE:

    To analyze the relationships among gestational risk, type of delivery and
    immediate maternal and neonatal repercussions.

    METHODS:

    A retrospective cohort study based on secondary data was conducted in a
    university maternity hospital. A total of 1606 births were analyzed over a 9-month
    period. Epidemiological, clinical, obstetric and neonatal characteristics were
    compared according to the route of delivery and the gestational risk characterized
    on the basis of the eligibility criteria for high clinical risk. The occurrence of
    maternal and neonatal complications during hospitalization was analyzed according
    to gestational risk and cesarean section delivery using univariate and
    multivariate logistic analysis.

    RESULTS:

    The overall rate of cesarean sections was 38.3%. High gestational risk was
    present in 50.2% of births, mainly represented by hypertensive disorders and fetal
    malformations. The total incidence of cesarean section, planned cesarean section
    or emergency cesarean section was more frequent in pregnant women at gestational
    high risk (p<0.001). Cesarean section alone did not influence maternal outcome, but was associated with poor neonatal outcome (OR 3.4; 95%CI 2.7-4.4). Gestational high risk was associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcome (OR 3.8; 95%CI 1.3-8.7 and OR 17.5; 95%CI 11.6-26.3, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the ratios were maintained, although the effect of gestational risk has determined a reduction in the OR of the type of delivery alone from 3.4 (95%CI 2.7-4.4) to 1.99 (95%CI 1.5-2.6) for adverse neonatal outcome.

    CONCLUSION:

    Gestational risk was the main factor associated with poor maternal and neonatal
    outcome. Cesarean delivery was not directly associated with poor maternal outcome
    but increased the chances of unfavorable neonatal outcomes.

    See more
  • Original Article

    Maternal and perinatal results in ten years of obstetrical care to human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(11):683-690

    Summary

    Original Article

    Maternal and perinatal results in ten years of obstetrical care to human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(11):683-690

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005001100009

    Views0

    PURPOSE: to evaluate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vertical transmission and risk factors related to perinatal infection. METHODS: descriptive study of 170 HIV-infected pregnant women and their 188 neonates, admitted from June 1994 to September 2004 at the "Maternidade do Hospital das Clínicas da UFMG". Demographic characteristics, mother's serologic state, mode of delivery and perinatal results were analyzed. Children were followed for 18 months after birth. Data were stored and analyzed by Epi-Info, version 6.0. Confidence interval was established at 95% (p<0.05). RESULTS: HIV infection was confirmed in 84 (45.4%) patients during gestation. Viral load was below 1,000 copies/mL in 60.4% patients. Highly active antiretroviral therapy was the predominant antiretroviral regimen (65.5%). C-section rate was high: 79.5%. Prematurity rate was 18.2%. There were 184 (97.8%) live births and four (2.2%) perinatal deaths among 188 neonates. Among live neonates 97.8% received zidovudine after birth. Global mother-to-child transmission rate was 3.8%. Virus vertical transmission rates for each period were: 60%, until 1996; 28% between 1996 and 1998; 0.68%, between 1999 and 2004. Significant risk factors were not found related to perinatal HIV-infection because there was a small number of infected neonates (n=6). CONCLUSION: there was a great reduction of HIV vertical transmission during the analyzed period. Current transmission rate is zero. This confirms that by adopting adequate measures perinatal virus transmission can be prevented.

    See more
    Maternal and perinatal results in ten years of obstetrical care to human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE