Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Inês Reis"

We found (3) results for your search.
  • Original Article01-01-2016

    Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2016;38(1):04-08

    Abstract

    Original Article

    Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2016;38(1):04-08

    DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1570110

    Views183

    Objective

    To evaluate the accuracy of fetal weight prediction by ultrasonography labor employing a formula including the linear measurements of femur length (FL) and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness (STT).

    Methods

    We conducted a prospective study involving singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies within 48 hours of delivery. Only pregnancies with a cephalic fetus admitted in the labor ward for elective cesarean section, induction of labor or spontaneous labor were included. We excluded all non-Caucasian women, the ones previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes and the ones with evidence of ruptured membranes. Fetal weight estimates were calculated using a previously proposed formula [estimated fetal weight = [1] 1687.47 + (54.1 x FL) + (76.68 x STT). The relationship between actual birth weight and estimated fetal weight was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The formula's performance was assessed by calculating the signed and absolute errors. Mean weight difference and signed percentage error were calculated for birth weight divided into three subgroups: < 3000 g; 3000-4000g; and > 4000 g.

    Results

    We included for analysis 145 cases and found a significant, yet low, linear relationship between birth weight and estimated fetal weight (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.197) with an absolute mean error of 10.6%. The lowest mean percentage error (0.3%) corresponded to the subgroup with birth weight between 3000 g and 4000 g.

    Conclusions

    This study demonstrates a poor correlation between actual birth weight and the estimated fetal weight using a formula based on femur length and mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness, both linear parameters. Although avoidance of circumferential ultrasound measurements might prove to be beneficial, it is still yet to be found a fetal estimation formula that can be both accurate and simple to perform.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge
  • Case Report12-01-2016

    Pyometra and Pregnancy with Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2016;38(12):623-628

    Abstract

    Case Report

    Pyometra and Pregnancy with Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2016;38(12):623-628

    DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1594304

    Views174

    ABSTRACT

    We describe a Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (HWWS) patient with previous history of infertility who got pregnant without treatment and presented a pyometra in the contralateral uterus throughout the gestational period, despite multiple antibiotic treatments. Due to the uterus' congenital anomaly and the possibility of ascending infection with subsequent abortion, this pregnancy was classified as high-risk. We believe that the partial horizontal septum in the vagina may have contributed to the closure of the gravid uterus cervix, thus ensuring that the pregnancy came to term, with an uneventful vaginal delivery.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Pyometra and Pregnancy with Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome
  • Review Article01-24-2021

    Intermittent versus Continuous Catheterization and Differences in the Evolution of Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2021;43(12):961-967

    Abstract

    Review Article

    Intermittent versus Continuous Catheterization and Differences in the Evolution of Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2021;43(12):961-967

    DOI 10.1055/s-0041-1740209

    Views214

    Abstract

    Objective

    To evaluate the differences between bladder emptying options (permanent catheterization and intermittent bladder emptying/spontaneous urination) regarding the effects on labor length, need of operative vaginal deliveries, and cesarean section rate.

    Data Sources

    The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.

    Selection of Studies

    The survey returned 964 studies. A total of 719 studies were evaluated by title and abstract, of which 4 were selected for inclusion.

    Data Collection

    All references were inserted in the Rayyan QCRI tool (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). The full text of the selected articles was obtained so we could later decide whether or not to include them in this systematic review.

    Data Synthesis

    No differences were found in the number of instrumented deliveries or in cesarean section rate between groups.

    Conclusions

    After evaluating the studies performed on the topic, we concluded that there is no clear advantage to either method, although continuous catheterization was associated with a greater occurrence of eutocic births. In the remaining outcomes, there were no differences between catheterization types.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Intermittent versus Continuous Catheterization and Differences in the Evolution of Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Search

Search in:

Article type
Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Section
Autors' Reply
Case Report
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editor's Note
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to the Editor
Nominata 2024
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Previous Note
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Thesis Abstract
Year / Volume
Year / Volume
2025; v.47
2025; v.46
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE
ISSUE