Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Herberth Régis de Araújo"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Original Article

    Mammographic parenchymal pattern in climacteric women receiving hormone replacement therapy

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2004;26(7):563-571

    Summary

    Original Article

    Mammographic parenchymal pattern in climacteric women receiving hormone replacement therapy

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2004;26(7):563-571

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032004000700009

    Views2

    PURPOSE: to measure changes and predictors of changes in mammographic density of climacteric women, before and one year after hormone replacement therapy. METHODS: seventy climacteric women of 45 years or more participated in the study. They were followed-up at a Climacteric Outpatient Service. All of them used regularly either estrogenic or estroprogestative HRT for one year. They were submitted to one basal mammography and another at the end of the first year. HRT schedules could be different from each other, although with the same bioequivalence. Mammographic density was evaluated blindly at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Age, ovarian function, time since menopause, body mass index, waist/hip ratio, age at menarche, age at first pregnancy, and smoking were evaluated as well. Mammographic density was classified according to the American College of Radiology BI-RADS system into one of the following four parenchymal patterns: A) entirely liposubstituted breasts, B) liposubstituted breasts with disperse glandular parenchyma, C) heterogeneously dense breasts, and D) extremely dense breasts. We proposed a subdivision of each category in to A e A1, B e B1, C and C1, D and D1 in order to identify smaller variations in mammographic density. Therefore, we attributed initial and final scores of 1-8 to each of the patients according to the mammographic density before and after HRT, corresponding to categories A to D1. The proportions of women that presented increase, decrease and no variation in mammographic density after 1 year of HRT were calculated. In addition, we estimated initial to final score variation using the paired t-test of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: mammographic density increased in 22.9%, decreased in 7.1% and did not change in 70% of the studied cases. A significant difference was observed between the score means before (2.2±1.82) and after HRT (2.5±1.9) (p=0.019). The androgenic distribution of body fat was associated with a denser mammographic pattern. CONCLUSIONS: an increase in mammographic density was shown in women undergoing HRT, and was most pronounced in women with androgenic fat distribution. Additional studies must be carried out in order to evaluate if this increment in mammographic density could impair the mammographic screening of breast cancer.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE