vulvovaginal candidiasis Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Original Article

    Laboratorial Aspects of Cytolytic Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis as a Key for Accurate Diagnosis: A Pilot Study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020;42(10):634-641

    Summary

    Original Article

    Laboratorial Aspects of Cytolytic Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis as a Key for Accurate Diagnosis: A Pilot Study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020;42(10):634-641

    DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1715139

    Views24

    Abstract

    Objective

    To identify clinical, microscopic, and biochemical characteristics that differentiate cytolytic vaginosis (CV) from vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC).

    Methods

    The present cross-sectional study analyzed the vaginal contents of 24 non-pregnant women aged 18 to 42 years who were attended at the Genital Infections Clinic at Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (CAISM-UNICAMP). They were diagnosed either with (CV = 8, VVC = 8) or without vulvovaginitis or vaginal dysbiosis (controls). The socio-demographic, clinical, and gynecological data were obtained from a detailed patient interview. Samples of the vaginal contents were collected for analysis of vaginal pH, gram stain, and specific fungal culture. The Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the differences between the groups. Odds ratios were used to compare the categorical variables. The significance level was considered at p < 0.05.

    Results

    Both women with CV and VVC had a lumpy vaginal discharge (p = 0,002) and vaginal hyperemia (p = 0.001), compared with controls. The inflammatory process was more intense in the VVC group (p = 0.001). In the CV group, there was statistical significance for the lactobacillus amount (p = 0.006), vaginal epithelium lysis (p = 0.001), and vaginal pH (p = 0.0002).

    Conclusion

    Cytolytic vaginosis and VVC diagnoses rarely differ on clinical characteristics but have different laboratorial findings. The present study highlights the importance of conducting an accurate investigation through laboratory tests rather than clinical criteria to avoid misdiagnosis.

    See more
    Laboratorial Aspects of Cytolytic Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis as a Key for Accurate Diagnosis: A Pilot Study
  • Artigos Originais

    Characterization of yeasts isolated from the vagina and their association with vulvovaginal candidíasis in two cities of the South of Brazil

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(2):58-63

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Characterization of yeasts isolated from the vagina and their association with vulvovaginal candidíasis in two cities of the South of Brazil

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(2):58-63

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000200003

    Views4

    PURPOSE: to evaluate the distribution of yeast species isolated from the vagina in two cities of the South of Brazil and compare the in vitro susceptibility profile of these yeasts against some antifungals, which are used in clinical routine. METHODS: all women attended from January to June 2004 for vaginal routine examinations, independent of being symptomatic or not were included in the study. Only those who presented immunodeficiency like AIDS or any other genital infection were excluded. Samples of vaginal discharge from the women (Jaraguá do Sul - SC (n=130) and Maringá - PR (n=97)) were cultivated. The yeasts were identified and submitted to the susceptibility test against the antifungals fluconazole, nystatin and amphotericin B. RESULTS: the frequency of positive cultures for yeasts was the same in both cities; C. albicans was the most prevalent species (about 24%), but its frequency was different: in SC it corresponded to 77.4% of the yeasts both in symptomatic and asymptomatic women and in PR it was 50.0% with predominance in symptomatic women. We observed high rates of susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B, but 51.1% of the yeasts presented dose-dependent susceptibility (DDS) to nystatin. C. albicans showed a higher tendency to be nystatin resistant (52.8% DDS) than non-albicans species (44.4%). CONCLUSIONS: our data showed geographic differences among the species of yeasts isolated from the vagina and suggest that this fact has clinical relevance considering the differences in susceptibility, especially regarding nystatin, which could be important for the management of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

    See more
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis: an exploratory study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2004;26(1):65-70

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis: an exploratory study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2004;26(1):65-70

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032004000100010

    Views2

    PURPOSE: to identify risk factors involved in Candida sp vulvovaginitis in an exploratory study using an intentional sample. METHODS: a cross-sectional study with a sample of 135 textile female workers living in Criciúma, South Brazil, between July and September 2002. Oral interview and physical examination were performed by a single gynecologist and vaginal swabs were collected for culture and plated on Sabouraud agar. Epi-Info, version 6.0 was used to analyze the collected data. Prevalence ratios were calculated with a 95% confidence interval. A multivariable analysis of the data by logistic regression and data entry using the SPSS, version 10.0 computer program, was performed. RESULTS: the prevalence of Candida sp vulvovaginitis confirmed by culture in this sample was 19.3%. The prevalence of clinical vulvovaginitis was 17.0% (sensitivity of 38% and specificity of 88%). Significant risk factors for clinically manifest vulvaginitis were the use of hormones and age between 25-34 years and for culture-proven Candida sp vulvovaginitis, regular menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS: the overall prevalence of Candida sp vulvovaginitis was 19.3%. A regular menstrual cycle was the main risk factor for Candida sp vulvovaginitis showing the existence of a relationship between menstrual cycle and Candida sp vulvovaginitis. This finding should be better investigated by a cohort study with a larger sample and correlated with blood hormone levels throughout the menstrual cycle.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE