Sterilization, tubal Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(9):459-464
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000900004
PURPOSE: describe epidemiologic profile of patients enrolled in the oocyte reception program at Hospital Regional da Asa Sul (HRAS) in Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, and its main indications. METHODS: prospective descriptive study, in which 330 patients enrolled in the waiting list program were studied. Sixty-seven women, irrespective of their infertility factor and that had not been contemplated by the treatment were included. Thirty women who lived in other cities, 50 patients over 50 years old, 24 patients that didn't want to take part in the study, nine patients that asked to be left out of the program and 150 women that couldn't be found by phone calls were excluded. The 67 patients included were interviewed in order to answer a questionnaire. Their medical handbook was recovered to confirm that the investigation required to establish the cause of infertility had been done. The data was registered and analyzed by SPSS version 12.0 software. RESULTS: the patients' epidemiologic profile is age range 40 to 49 years old (82%), non-white skinned (77,6%), catholic (71,6%), married (59,7%), in high school (76,1%), secondary infertility (53,6%) from which due to tubal sterilization (40,3%) and those ones who started trying to conceive before 35 years old (91%). The main indication to enroll in this oocyte reception program was age and low ovarian reserve. CONCLUSION: the results demonstrated the indiscriminate tubal sterilization. The oocyte reception program benefits women with reserved reproductive prognostic.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(9):459-464
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000900004
PURPOSE: describe epidemiologic profile of patients enrolled in the oocyte reception program at Hospital Regional da Asa Sul (HRAS) in Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, and its main indications. METHODS: prospective descriptive study, in which 330 patients enrolled in the waiting list program were studied. Sixty-seven women, irrespective of their infertility factor and that had not been contemplated by the treatment were included. Thirty women who lived in other cities, 50 patients over 50 years old, 24 patients that didn't want to take part in the study, nine patients that asked to be left out of the program and 150 women that couldn't be found by phone calls were excluded. The 67 patients included were interviewed in order to answer a questionnaire. Their medical handbook was recovered to confirm that the investigation required to establish the cause of infertility had been done. The data was registered and analyzed by SPSS version 12.0 software. RESULTS: the patients' epidemiologic profile is age range 40 to 49 years old (82%), non-white skinned (77,6%), catholic (71,6%), married (59,7%), in high school (76,1%), secondary infertility (53,6%) from which due to tubal sterilization (40,3%) and those ones who started trying to conceive before 35 years old (91%). The main indication to enroll in this oocyte reception program was age and low ovarian reserve. CONCLUSION: the results demonstrated the indiscriminate tubal sterilization. The oocyte reception program benefits women with reserved reproductive prognostic.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(5):230-234
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000500002
PURPOSE: to analyze the factors associated with the reproductive future of patients wishing to become pregnant after having being submitted to tubal ligation (TL), attended at a public service. METHODS: a prospective study including 98 patients previously submitted to TL, who came to the Human Reproduction Center of the University Hospital of Brasilia (HUB), from January 1996 to January 2004, wishing to become pregnant again These patients were followed up from their first appointment till the end of the study, when they answered a structured questionnaire about the social demographic aspects at both the moment they asked for the TL and the reversion of the procedure. RESULTS: the patients’ average age at the TL procedure was 25 years old. Among them, 55.1% were younger than 25, 46.9% had three or more children, and ten of them had only one child. The most common reasons for the TL procedure were: contraception (48%), financial difficulties (25.5%) and marital problems (15.3%). The major causes for wishing a new pregnancy were: a new relationship/marriage (80.6%), the desire of having another child with the same partner (8.2%), and the death of a child (6.1%). The regret time informed by most of the patients was between two and four years, and the search for reversion was between six and ten years. About 83.6% of the sample referred lack of information about the procedure and the difficulties of reversion. Twenty patients were submitted to TL reversal procedure; from the ten who became pregnant, only six delivered babies, after a full-term pregnancy. Eight patients were referred to in vitro fertilization treatment, four of them became pregnant and two delivered healthy babies. CONCLUSIONS: TL in young vulnerable women, not informed about the definitive condition of the method, may increase the search for attended reproduction services and impair their reproductive future, as far as only 8.1% of the sample delivered babies and reached their goal.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(5):230-234
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000500002
PURPOSE: to analyze the factors associated with the reproductive future of patients wishing to become pregnant after having being submitted to tubal ligation (TL), attended at a public service. METHODS: a prospective study including 98 patients previously submitted to TL, who came to the Human Reproduction Center of the University Hospital of Brasilia (HUB), from January 1996 to January 2004, wishing to become pregnant again These patients were followed up from their first appointment till the end of the study, when they answered a structured questionnaire about the social demographic aspects at both the moment they asked for the TL and the reversion of the procedure. RESULTS: the patients’ average age at the TL procedure was 25 years old. Among them, 55.1% were younger than 25, 46.9% had three or more children, and ten of them had only one child. The most common reasons for the TL procedure were: contraception (48%), financial difficulties (25.5%) and marital problems (15.3%). The major causes for wishing a new pregnancy were: a new relationship/marriage (80.6%), the desire of having another child with the same partner (8.2%), and the death of a child (6.1%). The regret time informed by most of the patients was between two and four years, and the search for reversion was between six and ten years. About 83.6% of the sample referred lack of information about the procedure and the difficulties of reversion. Twenty patients were submitted to TL reversal procedure; from the ten who became pregnant, only six delivered babies, after a full-term pregnancy. Eight patients were referred to in vitro fertilization treatment, four of them became pregnant and two delivered healthy babies. CONCLUSIONS: TL in young vulnerable women, not informed about the definitive condition of the method, may increase the search for attended reproduction services and impair their reproductive future, as far as only 8.1% of the sample delivered babies and reached their goal.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(12):715-720
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006001200005
PURPOSE: to investigate the effects of previous bilateral tubal sterilization on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. METHODS: retrospective study of 98 consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles. Fifty-five women with previous tubal sterilization without any other infertility factor (TL group) were compared with 43 women with infertility due only to mild male factor (MI group. Age, cancellation rate per induction cycle, response to ovulation induction (number of days of ovulation induction, total amount of gonadotrophin units used, number of follicles and oocytes retrieved), fertilization and cleavage rates, number of transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy per transfer cycle were the variables considered. RESULTS: the cycle discontinuation rate due to poor response, results of ovulation induction, fertilization and cleavage rates, number of transferred embryos and the occurrence of clinical pregnancy were similar in both groups. Considering solely the variable age in TL group, we observed that patients older than 35 years required higher gonadotrophin doses during ovulation induction (2445 versus 2122 IU), presented lower response with fewer follicular growth (11.3 versus 15.8) and less oocytes retrieved (6.1 versus 8.5) compared to younger women (34 years old or less). CONCLUSIONS: tubal sterilization did not interfere with in vitro fertilization outcomes. We observed a worse response to ovulation induction in women older than 35 years, who had previous tubal sterilization.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(12):715-720
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006001200005
PURPOSE: to investigate the effects of previous bilateral tubal sterilization on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. METHODS: retrospective study of 98 consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles. Fifty-five women with previous tubal sterilization without any other infertility factor (TL group) were compared with 43 women with infertility due only to mild male factor (MI group. Age, cancellation rate per induction cycle, response to ovulation induction (number of days of ovulation induction, total amount of gonadotrophin units used, number of follicles and oocytes retrieved), fertilization and cleavage rates, number of transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy per transfer cycle were the variables considered. RESULTS: the cycle discontinuation rate due to poor response, results of ovulation induction, fertilization and cleavage rates, number of transferred embryos and the occurrence of clinical pregnancy were similar in both groups. Considering solely the variable age in TL group, we observed that patients older than 35 years required higher gonadotrophin doses during ovulation induction (2445 versus 2122 IU), presented lower response with fewer follicular growth (11.3 versus 15.8) and less oocytes retrieved (6.1 versus 8.5) compared to younger women (34 years old or less). CONCLUSIONS: tubal sterilization did not interfere with in vitro fertilization outcomes. We observed a worse response to ovulation induction in women older than 35 years, who had previous tubal sterilization.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(7):403-409
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006000700005
PURPOSE: to compare in a retrospective way, 51 women who underwent tubal ligation, 30 through microlaparoascopy (Gmicrol) and 21 through minilaparotomy (Gminil). METHODS: the analyzed parameters were: total time for accomplishment of the procedure and the surgical technique, time of hospital stay and return to the habitual activities after the surgery, postoperative pain, morbidity, satisfaction degree and esthetic effect, considering values of p<0,05 as significant, and also standard cost. RESULTS: Gmicrol took less time to accomplish the surgery than the Gminil (43 against 57 minutes respectively, p<0,05), less time to accomplish the surgical technique (6.48 against 30.32 minutes respectively, p<0,05), and lower hospital stay (9,90 hours as against 41,7 hours respectively, p <0,05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding time to return to the habitual activities after surgery. To evaluate postoperative pain, a scale of 0-10 it was applied. Gmicrol present a lower pain score on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days (1.13 and 0.26 to Gmicrol and 4.52 and 1.14 to Gminil, respectively, p<0,05). There was no significant difference between immediate postoperative the most common complaint being pain at the site of pain and that on the 3rd postoperative day. Gminil presented a higher morbidity rate incision. To evaluate the satisfaction degree and esthetic effect, numeric values were attributed to as good, regular, poor and very bad as answered by the patiets. Gmicrol presented a higher satisfaction degree (p<0,05) and better esthetic effect as compared to Gminil (p <0,05). The microlaparoscopy standard cost was R$ 109.30 being lower than that of minilaparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: tubal ligation by microlaparoscopy, under local anesthesia and conscious sedation presented some advantages compared to minilaparotomy.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(7):403-409
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006000700005
PURPOSE: to compare in a retrospective way, 51 women who underwent tubal ligation, 30 through microlaparoascopy (Gmicrol) and 21 through minilaparotomy (Gminil). METHODS: the analyzed parameters were: total time for accomplishment of the procedure and the surgical technique, time of hospital stay and return to the habitual activities after the surgery, postoperative pain, morbidity, satisfaction degree and esthetic effect, considering values of p<0,05 as significant, and also standard cost. RESULTS: Gmicrol took less time to accomplish the surgery than the Gminil (43 against 57 minutes respectively, p<0,05), less time to accomplish the surgical technique (6.48 against 30.32 minutes respectively, p<0,05), and lower hospital stay (9,90 hours as against 41,7 hours respectively, p <0,05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding time to return to the habitual activities after surgery. To evaluate postoperative pain, a scale of 0-10 it was applied. Gmicrol present a lower pain score on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days (1.13 and 0.26 to Gmicrol and 4.52 and 1.14 to Gminil, respectively, p<0,05). There was no significant difference between immediate postoperative the most common complaint being pain at the site of pain and that on the 3rd postoperative day. Gminil presented a higher morbidity rate incision. To evaluate the satisfaction degree and esthetic effect, numeric values were attributed to as good, regular, poor and very bad as answered by the patiets. Gmicrol presented a higher satisfaction degree (p<0,05) and better esthetic effect as compared to Gminil (p <0,05). The microlaparoscopy standard cost was R$ 109.30 being lower than that of minilaparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: tubal ligation by microlaparoscopy, under local anesthesia and conscious sedation presented some advantages compared to minilaparotomy.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(9):529-533
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000900005
PURPOSE: to study the histological modifications that occur in the endometrium of women before and six months after tubal ligation (TL) and to correlate these findings with progesterone (P4) levels. METHODS: the study was conducted on 16 women with normal menstrual cycles who were evaluated before and in the sixth cycle after TL. P4 levels were determined from the 8th day at 2-day intervals until ovulation and on the 8th, 10th and 12th day after ovulation or on the 24th day of the cycle. An endometrial biopsy was obtained between the 10th and 12th day after ovulation or on the 24th day of the cycle and a correlation with P4 was determined. Data were analyzed statistically by the nonparametric McNemar test for the evaluation of hormonal determination and by the exact Fisher test for the histological evaluation of the endometrium, with the level of significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS: mean age was 34.1±1.3 years. The intermenstrual interval was 27.1±2.6 days and the duration of bleeding was 3 to 5 days, with no difference between the studied periods. Before TL, 8/16 (50.0%) of the cases had a secretory endometrium according to the cycle, 3/16 (18.8%) had a secretory endometrium not according to the cycle and 3/16 (18.8%) had a dysfunctional endometrium, suggesting a defect in the luteal phase in 6/16 (37.5%). After TL, 7/16 (43.8%) had a secretory endometrium according to the cycle, 3/16 (18.8%) a secretory endometrium not according to the cycle and 4/16 (25.0%) had a dysfunctional endometrium, suggesting a defect in the luteal phase in 7/16 (43.8%). In 2/16 (12.5%) of the cases before TL and in 2/16 (12.5%) other cases after TL it was not possible to perform histological evaluation due to insufficient material or unspecfiic endometritis. In the luteal phase after TL, mean P4 levels were significantly lower on days +8, +10 and +12 than before TL, being 15.1, 18.0 and 20.7 ng/ml, respectively, before TL and 10.6, 8.0 and 5.4 ng/ml after TL (p<0.05). Before TL, 5/8 (62.5%) of the cases with a secretory endometrium according to the cycle had P4 >10 ng/ml and 3/8 (37.5%) had P4 <10 ng/ml. After TL, when the endometrium was secretory according to the cycle, P4 was >10 ng/ml in 4/7 (57.1%) and <10 ng/ml in 3/7 (42.9%). These differences were nonsignificant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: six months after TL, the intermenstrual interval and the duration of bleeding were unchanged. P4 levels decreased during the luteal phase although this did not interfere in the endometrial response.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(9):529-533
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000900005
PURPOSE: to study the histological modifications that occur in the endometrium of women before and six months after tubal ligation (TL) and to correlate these findings with progesterone (P4) levels. METHODS: the study was conducted on 16 women with normal menstrual cycles who were evaluated before and in the sixth cycle after TL. P4 levels were determined from the 8th day at 2-day intervals until ovulation and on the 8th, 10th and 12th day after ovulation or on the 24th day of the cycle. An endometrial biopsy was obtained between the 10th and 12th day after ovulation or on the 24th day of the cycle and a correlation with P4 was determined. Data were analyzed statistically by the nonparametric McNemar test for the evaluation of hormonal determination and by the exact Fisher test for the histological evaluation of the endometrium, with the level of significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS: mean age was 34.1±1.3 years. The intermenstrual interval was 27.1±2.6 days and the duration of bleeding was 3 to 5 days, with no difference between the studied periods. Before TL, 8/16 (50.0%) of the cases had a secretory endometrium according to the cycle, 3/16 (18.8%) had a secretory endometrium not according to the cycle and 3/16 (18.8%) had a dysfunctional endometrium, suggesting a defect in the luteal phase in 6/16 (37.5%). After TL, 7/16 (43.8%) had a secretory endometrium according to the cycle, 3/16 (18.8%) a secretory endometrium not according to the cycle and 4/16 (25.0%) had a dysfunctional endometrium, suggesting a defect in the luteal phase in 7/16 (43.8%). In 2/16 (12.5%) of the cases before TL and in 2/16 (12.5%) other cases after TL it was not possible to perform histological evaluation due to insufficient material or unspecfiic endometritis. In the luteal phase after TL, mean P4 levels were significantly lower on days +8, +10 and +12 than before TL, being 15.1, 18.0 and 20.7 ng/ml, respectively, before TL and 10.6, 8.0 and 5.4 ng/ml after TL (p<0.05). Before TL, 5/8 (62.5%) of the cases with a secretory endometrium according to the cycle had P4 >10 ng/ml and 3/8 (37.5%) had P4 <10 ng/ml. After TL, when the endometrium was secretory according to the cycle, P4 was >10 ng/ml in 4/7 (57.1%) and <10 ng/ml in 3/7 (42.9%). These differences were nonsignificant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: six months after TL, the intermenstrual interval and the duration of bleeding were unchanged. P4 levels decreased during the luteal phase although this did not interfere in the endometrial response.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2001;23(2):69-73
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032001000200002
Purpose: to analyze the follow-up of regretful sterilized women who sought sterilization reversal at a public service. Method: a retrospective study was carried out with a population of sterilized women who attended the infertility clinic during the period from June 1983 to July 1998. The analysis of the data was descriptive. Results: among the 147 women who sought the infertility clinic, most were 20 to 30 years old and 60% were sterilized at the age of 25 years. During follow-up, 54.4% of the initial patients gave up treatment, 15% were discouraged to continue the investigation and only 31 (21%) underwent tubal anastomosis. Fourteen women became pregnant and nine (6.1%) of them had term gestation. Conclusion: women who request sterilization should be counseled and instructed about the definitive feature of this method in order to reduce regret after sterilization.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2001;23(2):69-73
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032001000200002
Purpose: to analyze the follow-up of regretful sterilized women who sought sterilization reversal at a public service. Method: a retrospective study was carried out with a population of sterilized women who attended the infertility clinic during the period from June 1983 to July 1998. The analysis of the data was descriptive. Results: among the 147 women who sought the infertility clinic, most were 20 to 30 years old and 60% were sterilized at the age of 25 years. During follow-up, 54.4% of the initial patients gave up treatment, 15% were discouraged to continue the investigation and only 31 (21%) underwent tubal anastomosis. Fourteen women became pregnant and nine (6.1%) of them had term gestation. Conclusion: women who request sterilization should be counseled and instructed about the definitive feature of this method in order to reduce regret after sterilization.