Government programs Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Artigos Originais

    Adequacy process of prenatal care according to the criteria of Humanizing of Prenatal Care and Childbirth Program and Stork Network

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2014;36(2):56-64

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Adequacy process of prenatal care according to the criteria of Humanizing of Prenatal Care and Childbirth Program and Stork Network

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2014;36(2):56-64

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032014000200003

    Views9

    PURPOSE:

    To evaluate the adequacy of the process of prenatal care according to the
    parameters of the Program for the Humanization of Prenatal Care (PHPN) and of the
    procedures provided by the Stork Network of Unified Health System (SUS) in the
    microregion of Espirito Santo state, Brazil.

    METHODS:

    A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012-2013 by interviewing and analyzing
    the records of 742 women during the postpartum period and of their newborns in 7
    hospitals in the region chosen for the research. The information was collected,
    processed and analyzed by the χ2 and Fisher's exact test to determine
    the difference in proportion between the criteria adopted by the PHPN and the
    Stork Network and the place of residence, family income and type of coverage of
    prenatal service. The level of significance was set at 5%.

    RESULTS:

    The parameters showing the lowest adequacy rate were quick tests and repeated
    exams, with frequencies around 10 and 30%, respectively, in addition to
    educational activities (57.9%) and tetanus immunization (58.7%). In contrast, risk
    management (92.6%) and the fasting plasma glucose test (91.3%) showed the best
    results. Adequacy was 7.4% for the PHPN, 0.4% for the Stork Network, with respect
    to the parameters of normal risk pregnancies, and 0 for high risk pregnancies.
    There was a significant difference between puerperae according to housing location
    regarding the execution of serology for syphilis (VDRL), anti-HIV and repeated
    fasting glucose tests, and monthly income influenced the execution of blood
    type/Rh factor tests, VDRL, hematocrit and anti-HIV test.

    CONCLUSION:

    Prenatal care in the SUS proved to be inadequate regarding the procedures
    required by the PHPN and Stork Network in the micro-region of a state in
    southeastern Brazil, especially for women of lower income, PACS users and
    residents of rural areas.

    See more
    Adequacy process of prenatal care according to the criteria of Humanizing of Prenatal Care and Childbirth Program and Stork Network

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE