Expectant management Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Original Article

    Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020;42(12):800-804

    Summary

    Original Article

    Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020;42(12):800-804

    DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1718444

    Views10

    Abstract

    Objective

    In recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies; therefore, it is important for tertiary centers to report their approaches and outcomes to expand and improve treatment modalities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the general characteristics, treatment and outcomes of cases diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy.

    Methods

    In total, 432 patients treated for ectopic pregnancy between February 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated.

    Results

    Overall, 370 patients had tubal pregnancy, 32 had cesarean scar pregnancy, 18 had pregnancy of unknown location, 6 had cervical pregnancy, and 6 had interstitial pregnancy. The most important risk factors were advanced age (> 35 years; prevalence: 31.2%) and smoking (prevalence: 27.1%). Thirty patients who did not have any symptoms of rupture and whose human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were ≤ 200 mIU/ml were followed-up with expectant management, while 316 patients whose β-hCG levels were between 1,500 mIU/ml and 5,000 mIU/ml did not have an intrauterine gestational sac on the transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound, did not demonstrate findings of rupture, and were treated with a systemic multi-dose methotrexate treatment protocol. In total, 24 patients who did not respond to the medical treatment, 20 patients whose β-hCG levels were > 5,000 mIU/ml, 16 patients who had shown symptoms of rupture at the initial presentation, and 6 patients diagnosed with interstitial pregnancy underwent surgery. Patients with cervical and scar pregnancies underwent ultrasound-guided curettage, and no additional treatment was needed.

    Conclusion

    The fertility status of the patients, the clinical and laboratory findings, and the levels of β-hCG are the factors that must be considered in planning the appropriate treatment.

    See more
    Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Expectant management for (tubal) ectopic pregnancy

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(8):465-470

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Expectant management for (tubal) ectopic pregnancy

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(8):465-470

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000800007

    Views2

    SUMMARY Objective: to evaluate the inclusion parameters in the selection of cases of (tubal) ectopic pregnancy for expectant management and to assess the results. Methods: a prospective study was carried out in 70 patients with unruptured (tubal) ectopic pregnancy, with the objective to carry out an expectant management. The main inclusion criteria in this study were the diameter of the tubal mass, that should be equal or inferior to 5,0 cm, reduced titles of beta-hCG (beta fraction of the chorionic gonadotropic hormone) as compared to the initial value within an interval of 48 h, hemodynamic stability, wishes for future pregnancy and a written permission to participate in the study. All patients were observed in the hospital and when reduction in beta-hCG titles was observed, the patients were discharged from the hospital and followed in the outpatient department, with weekly determinations of beta-hCG until levels lower than 5 mIU/ml were reached, that were considered successful. Results: of the 70 patients who underwent expectant management, only one needed a surgical intervention, because of tubal rupture. The initial values of beta-hCG of the patients ranged from 27 mIU/ml to 41,000 mIU/ml. The average diameter of the tubal mass was 2.9 cm. The presence of free liquid in the peritoneal cavity was observed in 50 patients, small amount in 26 patients, moderate in 16 and large in 8 patients. The ultrasonographic resolution of hematosalpinx occurred in 58 patients and tubal ring was visualized in 12 patients. On color Doppler, 52 were at low risk and 18 at medium risk. Conclusions: the expectant management should be applied with safety in the cases that respect the inclusion criteria, the index of success of this study being 98.6%.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE