Evaluation Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Review Article

    Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Recommendations and Assessment Tools

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2017;39(8):424-432

    Summary

    Review Article

    Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Recommendations and Assessment Tools

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2017;39(8):424-432

    DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1604180

    Views13

    Abstract

    The literature that supports and recommends the practice of exercise during pregnancy is extensive.However, although a more complete research on ways to evaluate the physical activity performedby pregnant women has been perfomed, it is found that there is no gold standard and that the articles in the area are inconclusive. Thus, the objective of the present article is to review relevant aspects, such as, technique and applicability of the different methods for the assessment of physical activity during pregnancy to providemore reliable and safe information for health professionals to encourage their pregnant patients to engage in the practice of physical activity. This review concluded that all tools for the analysis of physical activity have limitations. Thus, it is necessary to establish the objectives of evaluation in an appropriate manner, as well as to determine their viability and costeffectiveness for the population under study.

    See more
  • Artigos Originais

    Assessment of functional fitness through the set of AAHPERD tests in women after menopause: Is there a decline between the fifth and sixth decades of life?

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(6):278-282

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Assessment of functional fitness through the set of AAHPERD tests in women after menopause: Is there a decline between the fifth and sixth decades of life?

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(6):278-282

    DOI 10.1590/SO100-720320150005326

    Views9

    PURPOSE:

    to analize the level of functional fitness of a group of postmenopausal women in
    the city of Presidente Prudente using the set of functional fitness tests of the
    American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance and to
    check whether there are differences between groups of women in the fifth and sixth
    decade of life.

    METHODS:

    This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 175 postmenopausal women (follicle
    stimulating hormone level>26.72 mIU/L) in the city of Presidente Prudente in
    2013. The inclusion criteria were not being part of any type of systematic motor
    intervention for at least six months before the collection of research data;
    absence of motor or cognitive impairment that would prevent the evaluation
    protocols, and absence of chronic or degenerative disease, musculoskeletal injury
    or comorbidity that could prevent or limit the evaluations. The women were
    evaluated by the same trained examiners. The 50 to 59 year group showed a mean age
    of 55.3±4.5 years, mean FSH values of 53.5±21.1 mIU/mL, mean coordination of
    11.4±2.2 seconds, mean strength of 20.1±3.9 repetitions, mean flexibility of
    51.7±11.8 cm, mean 23.2±2.8 seconds agility and mean aerobic resistance of
    500±43/2 . The 60 to 69 year group had a mean age of 65.1±4.1 years with FSH
    54.9±15.9, 11.6±2.6 seconds coordination, strength 20.3±4.7 repetitions, 54.6±11.2
    cm flexibility, agility 24.7±4.3 seconds, and aerobic resistance of 508±51
    seconds.

    CONCLUSION:

    It was possible to analyze the functional fitness of postmenopausal women through
    the set of the American Alliance testing for Health, Physical Education,
    Recreation and Dance with no significant differences between groups for the
    variables strength, flexibility, aerobic capacity and coordination, and with only
    the speed variable showing significant differences. We recommend further studies
    seeking to formulate normative values for the population in question.

    See more
  • Artigos Originais

    Translation and validation into Portuguese of a questionnaire to evaluate the severity of urinary incontinence

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2011;33(4):182-187

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Translation and validation into Portuguese of a questionnaire to evaluate the severity of urinary incontinence

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2011;33(4):182-187

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032011000400006

    Views7

    PURPOSE: to translate into Portuguese, culturally adapt and validate the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire. METHODS: two Brazilian translators carried out the translation of the ISI into Portuguese and a version was generated by consensus. This version was back-translated by two other native English speaking translators. The differences between versions were resolved and the version was pre-tested in a pilot study. One week later, the ISI was reapplied to complete the retest. The final version of the ISI was applied together with the one-hour pad test to women with stress urinary incontinence. For the validation of the ISI, the reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and the construct were evaluated. RESULTS: the reliability of the instrument was tested using the Cronbach α coefficient, with a general result of 0.93, demonstrating excellent reliability and consistency of the instrument. The intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard errors of measurement were 0.96 and 0.43, respectively. The Pearson correlation revealed a strong positive correlation (r=0.72, p<0.0001) between the results of the ISI questionnaire and the one-hour pad test. CONCLUSION: the culturally adapted version of the ISI translated into Brazilian Portuguese presented satisfactory reliability and survey validity and was considered to be valid for the evaluation of the severity of urinary incontinence.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE