Embryonic structures Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(10):499-503
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032008001000004
PURPOSE: to evaluate the embryo's volume (EV) between the seventh and the tenth gestational week, through tridimensional ultrasonography. METHODS: a transversal study with 63 normal pregnant women between the seventh and the tenth gestational week. The ultrasonographical exams have been performed with a volumetric abdominal transducer. Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis (VOCAL) has been used to calculate EV, with a rotation angle of 12º and a delimitation of 15 sequential slides. The average, median, standard deviation and maximum and minimum values have been calculated for the EV in all the gestational ages. A dispersion graphic has been drawn to assess the correlation between EV and the craniogluteal length (CGL), the adjustment being done by the determination coefficient (R²). To determine EV's reference intervals as a function of the CGL, the following formula was used: percentile=EV+K versus SD, with K=1.96. RESULTS: CGL has varied from 9.0 to 39.7 mm, with an average of 23.9 mm (±7.9 mm), while EV has varied from 0.1 to 7.6 cm³, with an average of 2.7 cm³ (±3.2 cm³). EV was highly correlated to CGL, the best adjustment being obtained with quadratic regression (EV=0.2-0.055 versus CGL+0.005 versus CGL²; R²=0.8). The average EV has varied from 0.1 (-0.3 to 0.5 cm³) to 6.7 cm³ (3.8 to 9.7 cm³) within the interval of 9 to 40 mm of CGL. EV has increased 67 times in this interval, while CGL, only 4.4 times. CONCLUSIONS: EV is a more sensitive parameter than CGL to evaluate embryo growth between the seventh and the tenth week of gestation.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(10):499-503
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032008001000004
PURPOSE: to evaluate the embryo's volume (EV) between the seventh and the tenth gestational week, through tridimensional ultrasonography. METHODS: a transversal study with 63 normal pregnant women between the seventh and the tenth gestational week. The ultrasonographical exams have been performed with a volumetric abdominal transducer. Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis (VOCAL) has been used to calculate EV, with a rotation angle of 12º and a delimitation of 15 sequential slides. The average, median, standard deviation and maximum and minimum values have been calculated for the EV in all the gestational ages. A dispersion graphic has been drawn to assess the correlation between EV and the craniogluteal length (CGL), the adjustment being done by the determination coefficient (R²). To determine EV's reference intervals as a function of the CGL, the following formula was used: percentile=EV+K versus SD, with K=1.96. RESULTS: CGL has varied from 9.0 to 39.7 mm, with an average of 23.9 mm (±7.9 mm), while EV has varied from 0.1 to 7.6 cm³, with an average of 2.7 cm³ (±3.2 cm³). EV was highly correlated to CGL, the best adjustment being obtained with quadratic regression (EV=0.2-0.055 versus CGL+0.005 versus CGL²; R²=0.8). The average EV has varied from 0.1 (-0.3 to 0.5 cm³) to 6.7 cm³ (3.8 to 9.7 cm³) within the interval of 9 to 40 mm of CGL. EV has increased 67 times in this interval, while CGL, only 4.4 times. CONCLUSIONS: EV is a more sensitive parameter than CGL to evaluate embryo growth between the seventh and the tenth week of gestation.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(5):219-223
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032008000500003
PURPOSE: to evaluate the toxicity of tacrolimus on embryonic development in rats treated during the tubal transit period. METHODS: sixty Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (15 animals each), which received different doses of tacrolimus through intragastric administration: (T1) 1.0 mg/kg/day, (T2) 2.0 mg/kg/day and (T3) 4.0 mg/kg/day. The control group (C) received distilled water. The rats were observed daily to detect clinical signs of toxicity. The treatments were performed from the first to the fifth day of pregnancy. The following maternal variables were analyzed: body, ovary, liver, and kidney weights, food intake, number of corpora lutea, implants, alive and dead fetuses, and implantation rates. The fetuses and placentae were weighed and the former were observed in order to detect external malformation. Statistical analysis was performed by one way: analysis of variance (ANOVA), folowed by the Dunnet test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: there were no signs of maternal toxicity, such as body weight loss, decrease in food intake or in organ weights (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference among weights of fetuses (C: 1.8±0.6; T1: 2.2±0.5; T2: 1.9±0.5 and T3: 2.0±0.5 g) and placentae (C: 1,6±0.4; T1: 1.5±0.4; T2: 1.8±0.4 e T3: 1.6±0.4 g), with p>0.05; no external malformation was detected in the fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: the administration of tacrolimus to pregnant rats during the tubal transit period does not seem to generate any toxic effect to mother or embryo.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(5):219-223
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032008000500003
PURPOSE: to evaluate the toxicity of tacrolimus on embryonic development in rats treated during the tubal transit period. METHODS: sixty Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (15 animals each), which received different doses of tacrolimus through intragastric administration: (T1) 1.0 mg/kg/day, (T2) 2.0 mg/kg/day and (T3) 4.0 mg/kg/day. The control group (C) received distilled water. The rats were observed daily to detect clinical signs of toxicity. The treatments were performed from the first to the fifth day of pregnancy. The following maternal variables were analyzed: body, ovary, liver, and kidney weights, food intake, number of corpora lutea, implants, alive and dead fetuses, and implantation rates. The fetuses and placentae were weighed and the former were observed in order to detect external malformation. Statistical analysis was performed by one way: analysis of variance (ANOVA), folowed by the Dunnet test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: there were no signs of maternal toxicity, such as body weight loss, decrease in food intake or in organ weights (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference among weights of fetuses (C: 1.8±0.6; T1: 2.2±0.5; T2: 1.9±0.5 and T3: 2.0±0.5 g) and placentae (C: 1,6±0.4; T1: 1.5±0.4; T2: 1.8±0.4 e T3: 1.6±0.4 g), with p>0.05; no external malformation was detected in the fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: the administration of tacrolimus to pregnant rats during the tubal transit period does not seem to generate any toxic effect to mother or embryo.