Diabetes in pregnancy Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

  • Original Article01-27-1999

    Maternal perception of fetal movements as a method to evaluate fetal condition in diabetic women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(10):579-584

    Abstract

    Original Article

    Maternal perception of fetal movements as a method to evaluate fetal condition in diabetic women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(10):579-584

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999001000003

    Views109

    Purpose: to evaluate the accuracy of maternal perception of fetal movements (MPFM) in diabetic pregnant women, using Apgar score at the 1st and 5th min of life, intrapartum fetal distress and neonatal hypoxia as parameters. Methods: two hundred and nine diabetic women evaluated at the High Risk Prenatal Care Clinic of the Women's Hospital (CAISM) were analyzed retrospectively between June 1988 and May 1996. All patients had MPFM records within three days before delivery, fetal heart rate recordings during labor, gestational age greater than 30 weeks and a complete neonatal evaluation. MPFM was classified as normal if seven movements were recorded in 60 min. Results: the sensitivity of the test was 23 and 29% for Apgar score <7 at the 5th min and intrapartum fetal distress, respectively, and close to 50% for neonatal hypoxia (45.5%). Specificity was near 95% for the three standards, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 80% for fetal distress, increasing to 97 and 98% for Apgar >7 at 5 min and neonatal hypoxia. Conclusions: MPFM is a useful test to identify diabetic women needing fetal evaluation with more complex techniques, given the high NPV, that indicates the capacity to separate the cases where the fetus is in good condition.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Search

Search in:

Article type
Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Section
Autors' Reply
Case Report
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editor's Note
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to the Editor
Nominata 2024
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Previous Note
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Thesis Abstract
Year / Volume
Year / Volume
2025; v.47
2025; v.46
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE
ISSUE