anti-bacterial agents Archives - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
, Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2019;41(7):463-466
, Asymptomatic female genital tract colonization with Actinomyces spp is not uncommon, particularly among intrauterine device users. Pelvic actinomycosis is an extremely rare disease. The clinical picture can resemble an advanced ovarian malignancy. We report a case of pelvic actinomycosis mimicking ovarian malignancy diagnosed postoperatively. Preoperative diagnosis is possible if there is a high index of suspicion, obviating extensive surgery and preserving fertility, since long term antibiotic treatment can be completely effective. Pelvic actinomycosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of women presenting a pelvic mass, especially if there is intrauterine device use history.
Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2019;41(7):463-466
, Asymptomatic female genital tract colonization with Actinomyces spp is not uncommon, particularly among intrauterine device users. Pelvic actinomycosis is an extremely rare disease. The clinical picture can resemble an advanced ovarian malignancy. We report a case of pelvic actinomycosis mimicking ovarian malignancy diagnosed postoperatively. Preoperative diagnosis is possible if there is a high index of suspicion, obviating extensive surgery and preserving fertility, since long term antibiotic treatment can be completely effective. Pelvic actinomycosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of women presenting a pelvic mass, especially if there is intrauterine device use history.
Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2012;34(8):369-375
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032012000800005
PURPOSE: To determine the epidemiological profile of women admitted for urinary tract infection as well as to verify the most prevalent agents and response to antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study of 106 pregnant women admitted to a university hospital for urinary tract infection treatment during the period between January 2007 to December 2010. The evaluation was based on analysis of the medical records of these pregnant women, with the observation of hospitalization and pregnancy data, as well as its outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science, version 15.0. The bilateral Fisher exact test and Student's t test were used for data analysis, as well as descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: Positive urine cultures were observed in 60.5% of pregnant women admitted due to urinary tract infection. The most frequent infectious agent was Escherichia coli and no difference in resistance, recurrence or complications was observed between the most frequent etiologic agents. Pregnant women with previous UTI had a higher recurrence risk (OR=10.8; p<0.05). The antibiotics most commonly used during hospitalization were ampicillin and cefazolin. Change of therapeutic agent due to bacterial resistance occurred in 11.9% of patients who took cefazolin and in 20% of patients who took ampicillin (OR=5.5; p<0.05). The rate of gestational complications was the same for both treatments. There was no difference in mean number of days of hospitalization between the treatments. CONCLUSION: In the studied population ampicillin showed a higher rate of bacterial resistance than cefazolin, requiring a larger number of treatment regimen exchanges, without resulting in differences in clinical outcome or time of hospitalization.
Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2012;34(8):369-375
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032012000800005
PURPOSE: To determine the epidemiological profile of women admitted for urinary tract infection as well as to verify the most prevalent agents and response to antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study of 106 pregnant women admitted to a university hospital for urinary tract infection treatment during the period between January 2007 to December 2010. The evaluation was based on analysis of the medical records of these pregnant women, with the observation of hospitalization and pregnancy data, as well as its outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science, version 15.0. The bilateral Fisher exact test and Student's t test were used for data analysis, as well as descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: Positive urine cultures were observed in 60.5% of pregnant women admitted due to urinary tract infection. The most frequent infectious agent was Escherichia coli and no difference in resistance, recurrence or complications was observed between the most frequent etiologic agents. Pregnant women with previous UTI had a higher recurrence risk (OR=10.8; p<0.05). The antibiotics most commonly used during hospitalization were ampicillin and cefazolin. Change of therapeutic agent due to bacterial resistance occurred in 11.9% of patients who took cefazolin and in 20% of patients who took ampicillin (OR=5.5; p<0.05). The rate of gestational complications was the same for both treatments. There was no difference in mean number of days of hospitalization between the treatments. CONCLUSION: In the studied population ampicillin showed a higher rate of bacterial resistance than cefazolin, requiring a larger number of treatment regimen exchanges, without resulting in differences in clinical outcome or time of hospitalization.
Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(8):456-460
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000800004
PURPOSE: to analyze the effectiveness and safety of exclusive hospital parenteral antibiotic therapy to treat puerperal endometritis in a population of low socioeconomic level. METHODS: a prospective clinical trial evaluated 21 puerperae with a diagnosis of postpartum endometritis, whose deliveries occurred at a university hospital by cesarean section (52.4%) or normal delivery (47.6%). The sample was characterized by low socioeconomic and educational levels. The patients were submitted to a regimen of exclusive parenteral antibiotic, only during the hospitalization period (ATP-EX group). These results were compared with results obtained in a historical cohort in the same hospital (20 cases) submitted to a regimen of hospital parenteral antibiotic therapy complemented with ambulatory oral treatment (ATP+VO group). The patients were evaluated clinically on the occasion of periodic return visits in order to identify cases of recurrence and infectious complications. RESULTS: one patient from the ATP+VO group needed to be readmitted to the hospital on the 6th day after her discharge from the hospital with a diagnosis of endometritis recrudescence. No complications were observed among patients from ATP-EX group. CONCLUSION: for the treatment of puerperal endometritis, there was no additional advantage in using supplementary oral antibiotic therapy after patient discharge. The results using exclusive parenteral antibiotic treatment during hospitalization time indicate that it is effective and can be safely used in a population of low socioeconomic level.
Summary
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(8):456-460
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000800004
PURPOSE: to analyze the effectiveness and safety of exclusive hospital parenteral antibiotic therapy to treat puerperal endometritis in a population of low socioeconomic level. METHODS: a prospective clinical trial evaluated 21 puerperae with a diagnosis of postpartum endometritis, whose deliveries occurred at a university hospital by cesarean section (52.4%) or normal delivery (47.6%). The sample was characterized by low socioeconomic and educational levels. The patients were submitted to a regimen of exclusive parenteral antibiotic, only during the hospitalization period (ATP-EX group). These results were compared with results obtained in a historical cohort in the same hospital (20 cases) submitted to a regimen of hospital parenteral antibiotic therapy complemented with ambulatory oral treatment (ATP+VO group). The patients were evaluated clinically on the occasion of periodic return visits in order to identify cases of recurrence and infectious complications. RESULTS: one patient from the ATP+VO group needed to be readmitted to the hospital on the 6th day after her discharge from the hospital with a diagnosis of endometritis recrudescence. No complications were observed among patients from ATP-EX group. CONCLUSION: for the treatment of puerperal endometritis, there was no additional advantage in using supplementary oral antibiotic therapy after patient discharge. The results using exclusive parenteral antibiotic treatment during hospitalization time indicate that it is effective and can be safely used in a population of low socioeconomic level.