Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Antonio Alberto Nogueira"

We found (31) results for your search.
  • Original Article

    Misoprostol Administration Before Hysteroscopy Procedures – A Retrospective Analysis

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2022;44(12):1102-1109

    Summary

    Original Article

    Misoprostol Administration Before Hysteroscopy Procedures – A Retrospective Analysis

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2022;44(12):1102-1109

    DOI 10.1055/s-0042-1755462

    Views5

    Abstract

    Objective

    To evaluate the use of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy procedures regarding technical ease, the presence of side effects, and the occurrence of complications.

    Methods

    This is a retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with the review of medical records of 266 patients followed-up at the Gynecological Videoendoscopy Sector of the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto of the Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP – USP, in the Portuguese acronym) from 2014 to 2019, comparing 133 patients who used the drug before the procedure with 133 patients who did not.

    Results

    The occurrence of postmenopausal uterine bleeding was the main indication for hysteroscopy and revealed a statistical difference between groups (p < 0.001), being present in 93.23% of the patients in the study group and in 69.7% of the patients in the control group. Only 2 patients (1.5%) in the study group reported adverse effects. Although no statistical differences were observed regarding the occurrence of complications during the procedure (p = 0.0662), a higher total number of complications was noted in the group that used misoprostol (n = 7; 5.26%) compared with the group that did not use the drug (n = 1; 0.75%), a fact that is clinically relevant. When evaluating the ease of the technique (measured by the complete performance of all steps of the hysteroscopy procedure), it was verified that although there was no difference between groups (p = 0.0586), the control group had more than twice as many incompletely performed procedures (n = 17) when compared with the group that used misoprostol previously (n = 8), which is also clinically relevant.

    Conclusion

    The use of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in our service indicated that the drug can facilitate the performance of the procedure, but not without side effects and presenting higher complication rates.

    See more
  • Artigos Originais

    Umbilical endometriosis without previous pelvic surgery

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2008;30(4):167-170

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Umbilical endometriosis without previous pelvic surgery

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2008;30(4):167-170

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032008000400002

    Views0

    PURPOSE: to present a series of cases of umbilical endometriosis in patients in reproductive age, with no previous pelvic surgery. METHODS: four patients aged between 33 and 43 years were included in the study. They all presented umbilical bleeding associated or not with pelvic pain, and medical history varied from two months to four years. Abdominal wall ultrasound was performed for diagnosis support before surgical excision of the umbilical lesions, and histological examination was also performed. RESULTS: the ultrasonographic evaluation of the four patients showed hypoechogenic umbilical lesion suggestive of endometriosis. All patients were submitted to surgical excision and histological examination of the lesions. CA-125 serum levels were measured in three of the patients, but they were within normal ranges (from 6.8 to 10.1 U/mL). In addition to umbilical surgery, laparoscopy was performed in all patients, but only one presented concomitant pelvic endometriosis. In a one-year follow-up, patients maintained asymptomatic and there was no recurrence of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: umbilical endometriosis is a rare entity, but it may be remembered as a possibility in cases of umbilical nodulations or bleeding, even if there is no previous history of pelvic surgery with endometrial manipulation. Its treatment is always surgical and, in general, it is enough to promote complete elimination of the lesion and of the symptoms.

    See more
    Umbilical endometriosis without previous pelvic surgery
  • Artigos Originais

    Use of lidocaine spray in diagnostic hysteroscopy

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2007;29(4):181-185

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Use of lidocaine spray in diagnostic hysteroscopy

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2007;29(4):181-185

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000400003

    Views1

    PURPOSE: to determine the efficacy of 10% lidocaine spray applied to the cervix before the procedure of diagnostic hysteroscopy, in order to reduce the painful process and the discomfort caused by the exam. METHODS: a total of 261 consecutive patients participated in the study, which was conducted from March 2004 to March 2005. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group receiving topical lidocaine spray (lidocaine group - LdG) and the other, receiving no medication before the procedure (control group - CG). In the LdG patients, thirty milligrams of 10% lidocaine spray were applied to the surface of the cervix five minutes before hysteroscopy started. Immediately, after the end of the procedure, the patients from both groups were asked to respond to a questionnaire about pain and to quantify the pain, in centimeters, using a 10-cm non-graduated visual analog scale. The unpaired t test, the Mann-Whitney test and the chi2 test were used for statistical analyses, considering p significant if lower than 0.05. RESULTS: there was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding age, parity or percentage of patients in menacme or menopause, or regarding the indications for the procedure and the hysteroscopic findings. A biopsy was necessary in 57 of the 132 LdG patients and in 48 of the 129 CG patients (p=0.96). The mean pain score was 4.3±2.9 in LdG and 3.9±2.5 in CG (p=0.2). A difference in the mean pain score was observed only among patients in menacme and menopause receiving or not the lidocaine spray, with p=0.01 and p=0.04 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: the use of lidocaine spray during diagnostic hysteroscopy does not minimize the discomfort and pain of the patients and therefore should not be applied.

    See more
    Use of lidocaine spray in diagnostic hysteroscopy
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Twin pregnancy with one fetal beath

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(4):223-226

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Twin pregnancy with one fetal beath

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(4):223-226

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000400007

    Views1

    Purpose: to evaluate retrospectively the obstetrical and perinatal aspects of multiple pregnancies with the death of one fetus. Methods: a retrospective study on 26 pregnant women with multiple pregnancies and death of one twin. A conservative approach was followed and the patients were followed-up clinically with blood clotting tests. Results: in 50% of the cases fetal death occurred between 20 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. The time between death and resolution of pregnancy ranged from 6 to 148 h. Death of the other twin occurred in two cases. In 15 cases, the surviving twin had a good course, with two of them presenting slight neurological sequelae. In the other nine cases the other twin died after birth. No pregnant woman developed coagulation disorders.

    See more
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Ampicillin prophylaxis in premature rupture of membranes: randomized and double-blind study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(5):251-258

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Ampicillin prophylaxis in premature rupture of membranes: randomized and double-blind study

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 1999;21(5):251-258

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72031999000500002

    Views0

    Purpose: to evaluate whether prophylactic use of ampicillin could avoid or reduce maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity caused by premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and to extend the gestation period in those women. Methods: this was a prospective, randomized and double-blind study, carried out evaluating 121 pregnant women with PROM, randomized into two study groups. The treatment group (61 patients) received ampicillin and the control group (60 patients) received placebo. The placebo had the same characteristics as ampicillin (kind of packaging and color of the capsules) and was used in the same time regimen. The considered parameters for maternal infection were febrile morbidity (fever index), and the presence of chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis. The studied neonatal parameters were Apgar score (1st and 5th minutes), bacterial colonization of auditory canal, and blood culture. The statistical tests performed were Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon, and chi². Results: it was observed that ampicillin did not prolong the gestation, nor did it reduce the postpartum febrile morbidity or the rates of chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis. Ampicillin did not reduce the perinatal infectious morbidity nor improve the birth outcomes. All these results were consistent in cases of less than 72 h PROM. The limited number of cases with time of PROM greater than 72 h did not permit statistical analysis free of type II error. Conclusions: based on these results it was possible to conclude that the prophylactic use of ampicillin by pregnant women with less than 72 h PROM did not reduce either infectious maternal or perinatal morbidity. However, the presence of group B Streptococcus agalactiae in the blood culture from a neonate in the control group showed the necessity to start antibiotic treatment of pregnant women colonized by this microorganism.

    See more
  • Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

    Intraoperative laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexial masses: macroscopic criteria of malignity

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2004;26(3):253-253

    Summary

    Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

    Intraoperative laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexial masses: macroscopic criteria of malignity

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2004;26(3):253-253

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032004000300018

    Views0
    A postagem não tem conteúdo
    See more
  • Revisão

    Endometrial polyps

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(5):289-292

    Summary

    Revisão

    Endometrial polyps

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005;27(5):289-292

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000500010

    Views1

    Endometrial polyps are benign lesions, with a low potential of malignancy. In the reproductive period their diagnosis is established in symptomatic patients with abnormal uterine bleeding or infertility. Postmenopausal women are mostly asymptomatic but in approximately one third of the cases there is an association with abnormal bleeding. They are more frequent after the menopause and risk factors of cancer of the endometrium have not been associated in the same way as risk for endometrial polyps, although they are hormone-dependent as in patients in use of tamoxifen, for instance. Their definitive diagnosis is established by hysteroscopy-guided biopsy and their most effective treatment is hysteroscopic resection. Polyps may recur after treatment. Polypectomy is highly satisfactory after the menopause, is less successful in symptomatic women in the reproductive period and improves fertility rates in infertile women.

    See more
    Endometrial polyps
  • Editorial

    Reflections about the impact caused by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning against uterine and/or fibroid power morcellation

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(7):299-301

    Summary

    Editorial

    Reflections about the impact caused by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning against uterine and/or fibroid power morcellation

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(7):299-301

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-720320150005428

    Views1
    A postagem não tem conteúdo
    See more
    Reflections about the impact caused by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning against uterine and/or fibroid power morcellation

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE