Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Néli Sueli Teixeira de Souza"

We found (2) results for your search.
  • Resumos de Teses

    Estudo Comparativo entre a Histopatologia e a Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase para o Diagnóstico do Papiloma Vírus Humano em Lesões do Colo Uterino de Mulheres Infectadas pelo Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2000;22(9):597-597

    Summary

    Resumos de Teses

    Estudo Comparativo entre a Histopatologia e a Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase para o Diagnóstico do Papiloma Vírus Humano em Lesões do Colo Uterino de Mulheres Infectadas pelo Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2000;22(9):597-597

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032000000900011

    Views1
    Estudo Comparativo entre a Histopatologia e a Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase para o Diagnóstico do Papiloma Vírus Humano em Lesões do Colo Uterino de Mulheres Infectadas pelo Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana […]
    See more
  • Trabalhos Originais

    Histopathology accuracy for the diagnosis of HPV in cervical lesions of HIV-seropositive women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2001;23(6):355-364

    Summary

    Trabalhos Originais

    Histopathology accuracy for the diagnosis of HPV in cervical lesions of HIV-seropositive women

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2001;23(6):355-364

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032001000600003

    Views1

    Purpose: to compare histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical lesions of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive women. Methods: fifty-two HIV-seropositive women with suspected HPV cervical lesions were studied. Cervical scrapes were collected for PCR and colposcopy-guided biopsy was made for the histopathologic study. Three samples were disqualified for PCR, leaving a study population of 49 women. Results: the prevalence of HPV was 53% by histopathology and 85.7% by PCR. Among the 42 patients in whom HPV was detected by PCR, 26 were confirmed by histopathology (sensitivity = 61.9%). This method gave no false-positives (specificity = 100%), with 100% of positive prediction. Compared to PCR, the histopathology had: positive predcitive value = 100% and negative predcitive value = 30.4%. Among the 26 patients with HPV-positive biopsy, 15 (57.7%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); relative risk = 13.3. Conclusion: histopathology was 100% correct for HPV-infection diagnosis. It means that when the biopsy is positive, HPV will be present, confirming the clinical suspicion. However, the low sensitivity excludes histopathology as a screening examination in this group of women.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE