Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Juliano de Souza Gaspar"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Artigos Originais

    Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2014;36(2):65-71

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2014;36(2):65-71

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032014000200004

    Views1

    PURPOSE:

    To analyze the relationships among gestational risk, type of delivery and
    immediate maternal and neonatal repercussions.

    METHODS:

    A retrospective cohort study based on secondary data was conducted in a
    university maternity hospital. A total of 1606 births were analyzed over a 9-month
    period. Epidemiological, clinical, obstetric and neonatal characteristics were
    compared according to the route of delivery and the gestational risk characterized
    on the basis of the eligibility criteria for high clinical risk. The occurrence of
    maternal and neonatal complications during hospitalization was analyzed according
    to gestational risk and cesarean section delivery using univariate and
    multivariate logistic analysis.

    RESULTS:

    The overall rate of cesarean sections was 38.3%. High gestational risk was
    present in 50.2% of births, mainly represented by hypertensive disorders and fetal
    malformations. The total incidence of cesarean section, planned cesarean section
    or emergency cesarean section was more frequent in pregnant women at gestational
    high risk (p<0.001). Cesarean section alone did not influence maternal outcome, but was associated with poor neonatal outcome (OR 3.4; 95%CI 2.7-4.4). Gestational high risk was associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcome (OR 3.8; 95%CI 1.3-8.7 and OR 17.5; 95%CI 11.6-26.3, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the ratios were maintained, although the effect of gestational risk has determined a reduction in the OR of the type of delivery alone from 3.4 (95%CI 2.7-4.4) to 1.99 (95%CI 1.5-2.6) for adverse neonatal outcome.

    CONCLUSION:

    Gestational risk was the main factor associated with poor maternal and neonatal
    outcome. Cesarean delivery was not directly associated with poor maternal outcome
    but increased the chances of unfavorable neonatal outcomes.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE