Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
You searched for:"Heloísa De Luca Véspoli"
We found (3) results for your search.Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(3):112-117
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000300003
PURPOSE: to evaluate the influence of previous hormonal therapy (HT) on breast cancer prognostic markers in postmenopausal women. Methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out, applying questionnaires and medical record surveys of 157 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer diagnosis. Clinical data, personal and familiar history, HT use, and mammograms were investigated. The medical record surveys yielded information about tumor size, imunohistochemical data, and type of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the chi2 test. RESULTS: 38.2% of the patients were HT ex-users and 61.8% were non-users. Mean time of HT use was 3.7±3.6 years. HT ex-users were younger and with a shorter menopause time than non-users (p<0.05). 26.8% of the patients reported previous cases of breast cancer in their families, with no difference between the groups. Of the HT ex-users, 43.3% had previous mammograms, while of the non-users, only 11.3% (p<0.001). Mean tumor size was smaller in HT ex-users (2.3±1.1 cm) than in non-users (3.3±1.5cm) (p<0.001). The conservative surgeries (quadrantectomies) were predominant in HT ex-users (60%) when compared to non-users (32%) (p<0.001). The immunohistochemical study showed, a positive correlation between the presence of positive estrogen and progesterone receptors and the HT use (p<0.001). There was no correlation between HT and c-erbB-2 and p53. CONCLUSION: postmenopausal women who used hormonal therapy previously to breast cancer diagnosis presented indication of a better prognosis when compared to non-users.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(3):112-117
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000300003
PURPOSE: to evaluate the influence of previous hormonal therapy (HT) on breast cancer prognostic markers in postmenopausal women. Methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out, applying questionnaires and medical record surveys of 157 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer diagnosis. Clinical data, personal and familiar history, HT use, and mammograms were investigated. The medical record surveys yielded information about tumor size, imunohistochemical data, and type of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the chi2 test. RESULTS: 38.2% of the patients were HT ex-users and 61.8% were non-users. Mean time of HT use was 3.7±3.6 years. HT ex-users were younger and with a shorter menopause time than non-users (p<0.05). 26.8% of the patients reported previous cases of breast cancer in their families, with no difference between the groups. Of the HT ex-users, 43.3% had previous mammograms, while of the non-users, only 11.3% (p<0.001). Mean tumor size was smaller in HT ex-users (2.3±1.1 cm) than in non-users (3.3±1.5cm) (p<0.001). The conservative surgeries (quadrantectomies) were predominant in HT ex-users (60%) when compared to non-users (32%) (p<0.001). The immunohistochemical study showed, a positive correlation between the presence of positive estrogen and progesterone receptors and the HT use (p<0.001). There was no correlation between HT and c-erbB-2 and p53. CONCLUSION: postmenopausal women who used hormonal therapy previously to breast cancer diagnosis presented indication of a better prognosis when compared to non-users.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015;37(1):30-35
DOI 10.1590/SO100-720320140005134
To evaluate the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
In this cross-sectional study, 115 breast cancer survivors, seeking healthcare at a University Hospital in Brazil, were evaluated. Eligibility criteria included women with amenorrhea ≥12 months and age ≥45 years, treated for breast cancer and metastasis-free for at least five years. BMD was measured by DEXA at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femoral neck. Low BMD was considered when total-spine and/or femoral-neck T-score values were <-1.0 Delphi Score (DP) (osteopenia and osteoporosis). The risk factors for low BMD were assessed by interview. Data were analyzed statistically by the χ2 test and Fisher's exact test.
The mean age of breast cancer survivors was 61.6±10.1 years and time since menopause was 14.2±5.6 years, with a mean follow-up of 10.1±3.9 years. Considering spine and femoral neck, 60% of breast cancer survivors had low BMD. By evaluating the risk factors for low BMD, a significant difference was found in the percent distribution for age (higher % of women >50 years with low BMD), personal history of previous fracture (11.6% with low BMD versus 0% with normal BMD) and BMI. A higher frequency of obesity was observed among women with normal BMD (63%) compared to those with low BMD (26.1%) (p<0.05).
Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors had a high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015;37(1):30-35
DOI 10.1590/SO100-720320140005134
To evaluate the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
In this cross-sectional study, 115 breast cancer survivors, seeking healthcare at a University Hospital in Brazil, were evaluated. Eligibility criteria included women with amenorrhea ≥12 months and age ≥45 years, treated for breast cancer and metastasis-free for at least five years. BMD was measured by DEXA at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femoral neck. Low BMD was considered when total-spine and/or femoral-neck T-score values were <-1.0 Delphi Score (DP) (osteopenia and osteoporosis). The risk factors for low BMD were assessed by interview. Data were analyzed statistically by the χ2 test and Fisher's exact test.
The mean age of breast cancer survivors was 61.6±10.1 years and time since menopause was 14.2±5.6 years, with a mean follow-up of 10.1±3.9 years. Considering spine and femoral neck, 60% of breast cancer survivors had low BMD. By evaluating the risk factors for low BMD, a significant difference was found in the percent distribution for age (higher % of women >50 years with low BMD), personal history of previous fracture (11.6% with low BMD versus 0% with normal BMD) and BMI. A higher frequency of obesity was observed among women with normal BMD (63%) compared to those with low BMD (26.1%) (p<0.05).
Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors had a high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012;34(12):555-562
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032012001200005
PURPOSE: To assess the occurrence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A total of 158 breast cancer survivors were included in this cross-sectional study. Eligibility criteria were: women with amenorrhea >12 months and age ≥45 years, treated for breast cancer and no metastasis for at least five years. Clinical history and anthropometric indicator data (body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference, (WC) were collected. Biochemical parameters, including total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides (TG), glucose and C-reactive protein (CRP), were measured. MetS was diagnosed as the presence of at least three of the following diagnostic criteria: WC>88 cm, blood pressure≥130/85 mmHg, triglycerides≥150 mg/dl, HDL <50 mg/dL,and glucose≥100 mg/dL. The Student's t-test and χ² test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of breast cancer survivors was 63.1±8.6 years, with a mean follow-up of 9.1±4.0 years. MetS was diagnosed in 48.1% (76/158) and the most prevalent diagnostic criterion was abdominal obesity (WC>88 cm), affecting 54.4% (86/158) of the women. The patients without MetS had a longer follow-up compared those with MetS (p<0.05). Regarding the current BMI, PN average, those without MetS were overweight, and those with MetS were obese (p<0.05). Among the latter, comparison of BMI at the time of cancer diagnosis and current BMI (27.8±5.4 versus 33.4±5.4 kg/m²) showed a significant weight gain (p<0.05). Mean CRP values were higher in women with MetS (p<0.05). In the comparison of tumor characteristics and cancer treatments there was no difference between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors had a higher risk of developing metabolic syndrome and central obesity.
Summary
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012;34(12):555-562
DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032012001200005
PURPOSE: To assess the occurrence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A total of 158 breast cancer survivors were included in this cross-sectional study. Eligibility criteria were: women with amenorrhea >12 months and age ≥45 years, treated for breast cancer and no metastasis for at least five years. Clinical history and anthropometric indicator data (body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference, (WC) were collected. Biochemical parameters, including total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides (TG), glucose and C-reactive protein (CRP), were measured. MetS was diagnosed as the presence of at least three of the following diagnostic criteria: WC>88 cm, blood pressure≥130/85 mmHg, triglycerides≥150 mg/dl, HDL <50 mg/dL,and glucose≥100 mg/dL. The Student's t-test and χ² test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of breast cancer survivors was 63.1±8.6 years, with a mean follow-up of 9.1±4.0 years. MetS was diagnosed in 48.1% (76/158) and the most prevalent diagnostic criterion was abdominal obesity (WC>88 cm), affecting 54.4% (86/158) of the women. The patients without MetS had a longer follow-up compared those with MetS (p<0.05). Regarding the current BMI, PN average, those without MetS were overweight, and those with MetS were obese (p<0.05). Among the latter, comparison of BMI at the time of cancer diagnosis and current BMI (27.8±5.4 versus 33.4±5.4 kg/m²) showed a significant weight gain (p<0.05). Mean CRP values were higher in women with MetS (p<0.05). In the comparison of tumor characteristics and cancer treatments there was no difference between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors had a higher risk of developing metabolic syndrome and central obesity.