Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Daniela Reis Gonçalves"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Artigos Originais

    Right subclavian artery evaluation during first trimester ultrasound scan

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(6):252-257

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Right subclavian artery evaluation during first trimester ultrasound scan

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2015;37(6):252-257

    DOI 10.1590/SO100-720320150005278

    Views0

    PURPOSE:

    To determine the feasibility of evaluation of the right subclavian artery during
    the first trimester ultrasound scan, as well as to describe the technique for its
    evaluation and, in case of aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) identification,
    to determine its association with chromosomal abnormalities and/or cardiac
    malformations and its management.

    METHODS:

    A prospective study for evaluation of the right subclavian artery during the
    first trimester ultrasound scan (crown-to-rump length between 45 and 84 mm), in
    all consecutive single pregnancies, by a single examiner, using a Voluson E8
    system (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) with a 2 to 8 MHz RAB 4-8-D transabdominal
    probe, within a short period of time (less than 2 minutes), in a general low risk
    population. Color and/or power Doppler flow mapping was used to classify the right
    subclavian artery as normal or aberrant. Regression analysis with the IBM SPSS
    Statistics software for Windows, version 20.0 was used to determine the
    significance of the association between failure to examine/classify the right
    subclavian artery and both fetal crown-rump length and maternal body mass index.

    RESULTS :

    Median maternal age was 30 years (range: 17-43 years) and median gestational age
    at the time of evaluation of the right subclavian artery was 12 weeks (range:
    11-13 weeks). The evaluation of the right subclavian artery was successful in
    138/176 (78.4%) of the cases. ARSA was diagnosed in a single case (0.7%). This
    fetus with ARSA also presented a hyperechogenic focus on the left cardiac
    ventricle. Fetal echocardiography at 16 weeks of gestation was performed and
    confirmed ARSA and the hyperechogenic focus. Amniocentesis revealed a normal 46,
    XX karyotype.

    CONCLUSION:

    ARSA can be identified during a routine first trimester ultrasound scan. Our
    single ARSA case had a normal karyotype and no associated cardiac
    malformations.

    See more
    Right subclavian artery evaluation during first trimester ultrasound scan

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE