Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Carlos Henrique Menke"

We found (4) results for your search.
  • Original Article

    Lymphoscintigraphy imaging study for sentinel node mapping, comparing dextran 500 with phytate, in breast cancer patients

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(6):340-346

    Summary

    Original Article

    Lymphoscintigraphy imaging study for sentinel node mapping, comparing dextran 500 with phytate, in breast cancer patients

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(6):340-346

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032005000600008

    Views1

    PURPOSE: a case-control study comparing two radiocolloids used in scintigraphy to map the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: forty patients were prospectively enrolled between May 2002 and April 2004, after signing an informed consent form. In the present double-blind study, each patient was submitted twice to the same examination, a mammary scintigraphy, one with 99mTc-dextran 500 (dextran) and the other with 99mTc-phytate (phytate), on different days. A volume of 2 ml with 1-1.5 mCi of each radiopharmaceutical, in divided aliquots, was injected in the breast parenchyma in four points around in the tumor and the subcutaneous area superficial to the tumor. The image was obtained 2 h after the injection, using a gamma camera with high-resolution collimator. The lymph nodes were identified by anterior and lateral static scintigraphic images. Statistical analysis was done with the use of McNemar and Z tests. RESULTS: in the analysis of the 40 patients, we had 15 pairs with positive identical images, 4 pairs with negative images and 21 pairs with inconsistent images, either because one of them was negative, or because the SLN numbers were different. When the protocol was opened, we found 35 and 27 positive images and 5 and 13 negative images for dextran and phytate treatment groups, respectively. Among the negative images, 4 were shared by both groups. The McNemar test, used for the statistical analysis, showed p=0.026, odds ratio (OR) = 0.11 with 95% CI 0.01 < OR < 0.85. The accuracy, evaluated by the success ratio of the SLN mapping, was 67.5% for phytate and 87.5% for dextran, with p=0.032. Analysis of variance of the SLN number in lymphoscintigraphy images showed p=0.008. CONCLUSION: these results recommend the use of dextran instead of phytate for the SLN study of breast carcinoma by scintigraphy, when the same methodology is being used.

    See more
    Lymphoscintigraphy imaging study for sentinel node mapping, comparing dextran 500 with phytate, in breast cancer patients
  • Original Article

    Sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: comparison between methods

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2002;24(7):479-484

    Summary

    Original Article

    Sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: comparison between methods

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2002;24(7):479-484

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032002000700008

    Views1

    Purpose: to evaluate the lymphoscintigraphy, the hand-held probe and the vital blue dye to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast carcinoma and to establish sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy of the SLN detection. Methods: eighty-eight consecutive attended patients, with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes were enrolled for this study using the technique of mapping with 99m technetium dextran for scintigraphic images before surgery. In the operating room, five minutes before axillary incision, we injected 2 mL of 2.5% Bleu Patente V Sodique around the tumor and intradermally. Then the gamma probe helped to find out the hot spot where the SLN was supposed to be. The pathologic results of SLN were obtained by the standard technique with hematoxylin and eosin staining in seventy-seven patients. Results: scintigraphy was conclusive for lymphatic basins in 62.1% of 58 cases, concerning SLN identification. In these conclusive patients, there were 9 in which 2 nodes appeared simultaneously without lymph vessel delineation. Using the gamma probe, at least one axillary SLN site could be found preoperatively in 45 cases (84.9%), and intraoperatively, associated with blue dye, in all 53 patients. In 32 of 35 patients only vital blue dye was used with success. Concerning the groups "day" and "other day" (when biopsy was performed on the same day or the other day, after the radiolabeled injection), therefore different regarding time and gamma counts, both achieved the same results regarding SLN detection. Forty-one patients had positive axillary lymph nodes and only two had false negative SLN, giving sensitivity of 95.3%, a NPV of 95.5% and overall accuracy of 97.7%. Conclusions: the lymph node mapping with the use of technetium and patent blue V, alone or associated, is feasible. The time since the injection of technetium up to surgery varied from 3 to 17 h. The pathologic findings confirmed that the biopsied lymph node was the true sentinel node in 97.6% of the cases and validated the SLN mapping, and this should lead to an avoidance of complete axillary dissection as a routine procedure in patients with negative SLN.

    See more
  • Original Article

    Intraoperative injection of technetium-99m-dextran 500 for the identification of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(10):486-490

    Summary

    Original Article

    Intraoperative injection of technetium-99m-dextran 500 for the identification of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(10):486-490

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032010001000003

    Views5

    PURPOSE: to determine the efficacy of intraoperative injection of Dextran-500-99m-technetium (Tc) for the identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer and analyze time to label the SLN in the axillary region. METHODS: a prospective study between April 2008 and June 2009, which included 74 sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer in stages T1N0 and T2N0. After induction of anesthesia, 0.5 to 1.5 mCi of Dextran-500-99m-Tc filtered 0.22 µm in a volume of 5 mL was injected intraoperative using the subareolar technique for SLNB. After labeling with the radioisotope, 2 mL of patent blue was injected. The time elapsed between injection and the axillary hot spot, the in vivo and ex vivo counts of the hottest nodes, the background count, and the number of SLN identified were documented. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with SPSS program, version 18. RESULTS: we identified the SLN in 100% of cases. The rate of SLN identification with the probe was 98% (73/74 cases). In one case (1.35%) the SLN was labeled only with the blue dye. The mean dose of radioisotope injected was 0.97±0.22 mCi. The average time to label the SLN was 10.7 minutes (±5.7 min). We identified on average of 1.66 SLN labeled with the radioisotope. CONCLUSION: the procedure for SLN identification with an intraoperative injection of the radioisotope is oncologically safe and comfortable for the patient, providing agility to the surgical team.

    See more
  • Thesis Abstract

    Tumor size as a surrogate end-point for the detection of early breast cancer: the experience of a single academic institution of Southern Brazil over a period of three decades (1972-2002)

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(11):685-685

    Summary

    Thesis Abstract

    Tumor size as a surrogate end-point for the detection of early breast cancer: the experience of a single academic institution of Southern Brazil over a period of three decades (1972-2002)

    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(11):685-685

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032006001100009

    Views0
    A postagem não tem conteúdo
    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE