Você pesquisou por y - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

You searched for:"Adriana Mota Bione Noronha"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Artigos Originais

    Amniotic fluid volume associated with fetal anomalies diagnosed in a reference center in the Brazilian Northeast

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2009;31(4):164-170

    Summary

    Artigos Originais

    Amniotic fluid volume associated with fetal anomalies diagnosed in a reference center in the Brazilian Northeast

    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2009;31(4):164-170

    DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032009000400002

    Views2

    PURPOSE: to determine factors associated to amniotic fluid volume and frequencies of fetal anomalies, in a reference center in Pernambuco. METHODS: a transversal study performed in high-risk pregnant women submitted to obstetrical morphological ultrasound, from March 2002 to March 2006, at an institution from Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. The intrauterine diagnosis was confirmed after birth. Sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics, amniotic liquid volume and presence of fetal anomalies were the variables studied. Fisher's exact, χ2, and Student's t tests, at a significance level of 5% were applied to verify the correlation among the variables. Prevalence rate and confidence interval at 95% were calculated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven pregnant women (56.2%) with congenital anomalies and 200 (43.8%) without anomalies, confirmed in the postnatal, were included in the study. The average of maternal ages and gestation periods were 24.8±6.5 years and 35.9±3.7 weeks, respectively. The fetal anomalies were discovered in the central nervous system (50.6%) and genitourinary tract (23.0%). The presence of congenital anomalies were significantly linked with reduced liquid/oligohydramnios (p=0.0002) and increased liquid/polyhydramnios (p<0.0001). Intrauterine mortality was more frequent in the group with anomalies, as compared to the healthy fetuses (10.5 versus 2.5%; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of congenital anomalies in the high-risk pregnant women group was 56.2%. Most of the central nervous system malformations were diagnosed intrauterus. Changes in the amniotic fluid were the factors more strongly associated with congenital anomalies.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Arigos Originais
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE