The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

Home » Issues » 2021, Volume 43, Number 6

Editorial

The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021;43(6):425-428

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731803

Views 1

Individual Feedback to Candidates

Feedback on the results of each candidate’s performance in the IPT-GO is provided confidentially through a password-protected online system with personal access. The aim of this measure is to avoid embarrassment, discrimination or disqualification of candidates with unsatisfactory performance. Therefore, this evaluation is not intended to rank candidates or services. The online system presents graphs where candidates can assess the progression of their individual performance and compare it to their peers through the median (Me), 30th percentile (P30) and 60th percentile (P60) of the overall performance. For candidates completing residency programs (R3), in addition to the evaluation of the performance level in the triennium, information on whether or not they have received a bonus for TEGO of the following year is also provided.

[…]

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Leia também

close-button

How to cite this article

EndNote RIS

Electronic Document Format (Vancouver)

Sá MFS, Romão GS, Fernandes CE, Silva Filho AL. The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(6):425-8.

Electronic Document Format (ABNT)

Sá, Marcos Felipe Silva de; Romão, Gustavo Salata; Fernandes, César Eduardo; Silva Filho, Agnaldo Lopes da. The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, v. 43, n. 6, p. 425-428, Sep. 2021.

Electronic Document Format (APA)

Sá, M. F. S. , Romão, G. S., Fernandes, C. E., & Silva Filho, A. L. (2021). The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 43(6), 425-428.

Electronic Document Format (ISO)

Sá, Marcos Felipe Silva de and Romão, Gustavo Salata and Fernandes, César Eduardo and Silva Filho, Agnaldo Lopes da. The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [online]. 2021, vol. 43, n. 6, [cited 2024-06-26], pp.425-428. Available from: <https://journalrbgo.org/article/the-individual-progress-test-of-gynecology-and-obstetrics-residents-tpi-go-the-brazilian-experience-by-febrasgo/>.
✕

The Individual Progress Test of Gynecology and Obstetrics Residents (TPI-GO): The Brazilian Experience by FEBRASGO |

Individual Feedback to Candidates

Feedback on the results of each candidate's performance in the IPT-GO is provided confidentially through a password-protected online system with personal access. The aim of this measure is to avoid embarrassment, discrimination or disqualification of candidates with unsatisfactory performance. Therefore, this evaluation is not intended to rank candidates or services. The online system presents graphs where candidates can assess the progression of their individual performance and compare it to their peers through the median (Me), 30th percentile (P30) and 60th percentile (P60) of the overall performance. For candidates completing residency programs (R3), in addition to the evaluation of the performance level in the triennium, information on whether or not they have received a bonus for TEGO of the following year is also provided.

[...]