Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

Home » Issues » 2017, Volume 39, Number 12

Systematic Review

Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review

Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2017;39(12):686-691

DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604065

Views 13

Abstract

Purpose

To verify if pethidine is safe for the conceptus when used during labor.

Methods

Systematic review in the Capes Periodicals/PubMed and MEDLINE/Virtual Health Library (BVS, in the Portuguese acronym) databases.

Results

A total of 17 studies published from January 1st, 2000, to September 2nd, 2016, with a total of 1,688 participants involved were included in the present review. There was no record of conceptus vitality decrease associated with low doses of pethidine being administered to mothers during labor.

Conclusions

Intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) pethidine at low doses, of up to 50 mg, is safe to administer during labor.

Key-words Labor pethidine safety

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English PDF - Português Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English PDF - Português Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
research-article
review-article
Section
Arigos Originais
Article
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Carta ao Editor
Cartas
Case Report
Case Reports
Caso e Tratamento
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Corrigendum
Editoriais
Editorial
Equipamentos e Métodos
Errata
Erratas
Erratum
FEBRASGO POSITION STATEMENT
Febrasgo Statement
Febrasgo Statement Position
FIGO Statement
GUIDELINES
Integrative Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Métodos e Técnicas
Nota do Editor
Nota Prévia
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Relato de Caso
Relato de Casos
Relatos de Casos
Reply to the Letter to the Editor
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Tese
Resumos de Teses
Resumos dos Trabalhos Premiados no 50º Congresso Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revisão
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnica e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Técnicas e Métodos
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Leia também

close-button

How to cite this article

EndNote RIS

Electronic Document Format (Vancouver)

Nunes RR, Colares PGB, Montenegro JP. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2017;39(12):686-91.

Electronic Document Format (ABNT)

Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues; Colares, Paulo Giordano Baima; Montenegro, Juliana Pinto. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, v. 39, n. 12, p. 686-691, Dec. 2017.

Electronic Document Format (APA)

Nunes, R. R., Colares, P. G. B., & Montenegro, J. P. (2017). Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 39(12), 686-691.

Electronic Document Format (ISO)

Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues and Colares, Paulo Giordano Baima and Montenegro, Juliana Pinto. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia [online]. 2017, vol. 39, n. 12, [cited 2024-12-22], pp.686-691. Available from: <https://journalrbgo.org/article/is-pethidine-safe-during-labor-systematic-review/>.
✕

Fig. 1 | Flow chart of the excluded and selected articles.