Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review - Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

Home » Issues » 2017, Volume 39, Number 12

Systematic Review

Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017;39(12):686-691

DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604065

Views 10

Abstract

Purpose

To verify if pethidine is safe for the conceptus when used during labor.

Methods

Systematic review in the Capes Periodicals/PubMed and MEDLINE/Virtual Health Library (BVS, in the Portuguese acronym) databases.

Results

A total of 17 studies published from January 1st, 2000, to September 2nd, 2016, with a total of 1,688 participants involved were included in the present review. There was no record of conceptus vitality decrease associated with low doses of pethidine being administered to mothers during labor.

Conclusions

Intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) pethidine at low doses, of up to 50 mg, is safe to administer during labor.

Key-words labor pethidine safety

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read Full Text

opener
PDF - English Complete text JATS XML
How to Cite
Mendeley

Search

Search in:

Article type
abstract
book-review
brief-report
case-report -
correction
editorial
editorial -
letter
letter -
other -
rapid-communication
research-article
research-article -
review-article
review-article -
Section
Abstracts of Awarded Papers at the 50th Brazilian Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Artigo de Revisão
Original Articles
Carta ao Editor
Case Report
Case Report and Treatment
Clinical Consensus Recommendation
Editorial
Editorial
Equipments and Methods
Erratum
Febrasgo Position Statement
Letter to the Editor
Methods and Techniques
Nota do Editor
Original Article
Original Article/Contraception
Original Article/Infertility
Original Article/Obstetrics
Original Article/Oncology
Original Article/Sexual Violence/Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Original Article/Teaching and Training
Original Articles
Original Articles
Previous Note
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Resposta dos Autores
Resumo De Tese
Resumos de Teses
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Article
Systematic Review
Técnicas e Equipamentos
Thesis Abstract
Trabalhos Originais
Year / Volume
2024; v.46
2023; v.45
2022; v.44
2021; v.43
2020; v.42
2019; v.41
2018; v.40
2017; v.39
2016; v.38
2015; v.37
2014; v.36
2013; v.35
2012; v.34
2011; v.33
2010; v.32
2009; v.31
2008; v.30
2007; v.29
2006; v.28
2005; v.27
2004; v.26
2003; v.25
2002; v.24
2001; v.23
2000; v.22
1999; v.21
1998; v.20
ISSUE

Leia também

close-button

How to cite this article

EndNote RIS

Electronic Document Format (Vancouver)

Nunes RR, Colares PGB, Montenegro JP. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017;39(12):686-91.

Electronic Document Format (ABNT)

Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues; Colares, Paulo Giordano Baima; Montenegro, Juliana Pinto. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, v. 39, n. 12, p. 686-691, Dec. 2017.

Electronic Document Format (APA)

Nunes, R. R., Colares, P. G. B., & Montenegro, J. P. (2017). Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 39(12), 686-691.

Electronic Document Format (ISO)

Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues and Colares, Paulo Giordano Baima and Montenegro, Juliana Pinto. Is Pethidine Safe during Labor? Systematic Review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [online]. 2017, vol. 39, n. 12, [cited 2024-07-01], pp.686-691. Available from: <https://journalrbgo.org/article/is-pethidine-safe-during-labor-systematic-review/>.
✕

Fig. 1 | Flow chart of the excluded and selected articles.